| Code: | RM01 | Acronym: | MIC |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Research Methodologies |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Microscopy |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Master Degree in Marine Sciences - Marine Resources |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCMRM | 17 | Oficial Plan 2018 | 1 | - | 5 | 50 | 135 |
Present and discuss the scientific method and the more frequent failures.
Review, discuss and train the forms of scientific communication for different audiences.
Make incursions in the management of bibliometrics and publishing systems.
Addressing issues of ethics in research and the interaction of science and society.
To promote opportunities to gain or to improve transversal competences.
Students should be able to improve their criative capacities and to gain critical abilities on how to correctly communicate scientific results, orally and in writing, for diverse audicences.
Enhance the capabilities of individual communication and the capacity for designing scientific studies.
Have the ability to search and interpret metric indicators of scientific production.
Aquisition and improvement of tranversal competences.
The fundamental concepts of scientific methodology.
Common basic errors and systems of validation and dissemination of scientific results.
The scientific world: publishers, editors, peers, authors. The indexing systems.
Presentation of databases and discussion of indicators of scientific impact.
The planning of a scientific study (e.g., proposals for funding, dissertation proposal).
Brainstorming in group for project definition. Conclusion with mind mapping software.
Preparing and presenting a Scientific Poster.
Preparing and presenting an Oral Communication.
Writing a scientific paper.
Writing and presentation of a thesis, of a dissertation or of a internship report.
Bibliographic databases and management of references via software.
Ethics and fraud in science - fundamentals and analyses of cases.
Communicate science to society.
Lectures
Exposure with discussion
Brainstorming
Work and discussion of group
Work and discussion extended
Representation
| Designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Exame | 30,00 |
| Participação presencial | 10,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 30,00 |
| Trabalho prático ou de projeto | 30,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| Designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Elaboração de projeto | 25,00 |
| Estudo autónomo | 43,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 42,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação | 25,00 |
| Total: | 135,00 |
According to the rules of the U.Porto and ICBAS, namely attendance to at least 3/4 of the classes. Attendance toWe also consider the participation in at least 1 of the 2 Special Work requested (see below).
Final Grade (0 to 20 points): Task 1 + Task 2 + Task 3 + Participation
Note 1: Each Task is scored from 0 to 6 values. The Participation is scored from 0 to 2 values.
Note 2: The participation (P) rewards the quality of performance (QD) of each student throughout the classes, taking into account the attendance (A). The classification to give P = QD x A (% of attendance to classes).
Note 3: Bónus of 0.5 points on Tasks 1 and 2 if written and presented in English.
Task 1. Small Group (class divided into groups of ca. 3 to 4 students):
Completion and presentation of a poster on a theme to choose. It is randomly selected at the time and day who presents the poster. Presentation Duration: 7-10 min. Discussion: up to 10 minutes.
There is a self-assessment of the performance of each element of the group, in % (0 to 100), to deliver on the day of presentation. The percent of participation of each student may influence its final grade.
Task 2. Enlarged Group (class divided into 3 groups of approximately equal number, ca. 6 to 8 students):
Preparation of project proposal for Master Dissertation (with 1 year duration). Work of simulation to create a project based on the form used in the Masters. Delivery (printed and PDF) and oral presentation (up to 15 min), followed by critical discussion (15 min).
The group shall appoint a spokesman for the presentation of the work. Is made self-assessment of the performance of each element of the group, in % (o to 100), to deliver on the day of presentation. The percent of participation of each student will influence its final note individually.
Task 3. Final Exam (test of multiple choice).
Face to evaluation mode, is only subject to improvement of note the Task 3 (except if the student attend to new classes during the next academic year).