| Code: | PSDH15 | Acronym: | DTI I |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Sexology |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Psychology |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Doctoral Programme in Human Sexuality |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDSH | 14 | Plano de Estudos em vigor | 2 | - | 6 | 24 | 162 |
The course Presentation of Research Papers at conferences and scientific meetings and the publication in scientific journals aims to encourage doctoral students to share the results of their research, thus contributing to achieving the purpose of the Doctoral Program in Human Sexuality.
This course builds on the Scientific Writing SeminarScientific writing
Submission of papers
Tutorial guidance, normally on a weekly basis (it is assigned to each supervisor one hour of lecturing load for each doctoral student).
The supervisor is responsible for the evaluation of the student taking into account the student’s activities of preparation and presentation of research papers in scientific meetings. These presentations can be made orally or in a poster format, on national or international meetings, and usually focus partial aspects of the students’ work. For the students’ evaluation supervisors consider the following criteria: students’ ability to select relevant information; accuracy and clarity of the presentation and the students’ ability to work autonomously
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico | 100,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Apresentação/discussão de um trabalho científico | 10,00 |
| Estudo autónomo | 54,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 24,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação | 54,00 |
| Trabalho escrito | 20,00 |
| Total: | 162,00 |
The supervisor is responsible for the evaluation of the student taking into account the student’s activities of preparation and presentation of research papers in scientific meetings. These presentations can be made orally or in a poster format, on national or international meetings, and usually focus partial aspects of the students’ work. For the students’ evaluation supervisors consider the following criteria: students’ ability to select relevant information; accuracy and clarity of the presentation and the students’ ability to work autonomously.