| Code: | EFA01 | Acronym: | ACTEFA |
| Keywords | |
|---|---|
| Classification | Keyword |
| OFICIAL | Educational Sciences |
| Active? | Yes |
| Responsible unit: | Education Sciences |
| Course/CS Responsible: | Master in Adult Education and Training |
| Acronym | No. of Students | Study Plan | Curricular Years | Credits UCN | Credits ECTS | Contact hours | Total Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MEFA | 12 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | 65 | 162 |
| MTP | 1 | Official Curricular Structure | 1 | - | 6 | 65 | 162 |
Aims
To discuss theoretically the discourses and scientific practices in the adult educational field
To address the main theoretical references structuring the field of adult education
To develop the spirit of critical analysis in the approach to the educational field
Learning outcomes
Critical analysis of the discourses and practices of the field of adult education
Design of devices for adult education and training theoretically sustained
Knowledge of major theoretical discourses present in the field of adult education
Acquisition of interpretive theory of educational facts
Reflectiveprofessional practicein the fieldof adult education
Does not apply
I-The modern paradigm of science in the education field: ambiguities and purposes of a unifying project
1.1. From modern science to Psychology of Education: adventures and misadventures of an ambiguous relationship
1.2. A science for education and the dichotomy between individual and social
1. 3. Education as a utopian project: from the convergence of purposes to the conflict of epistemological projects
1.4. The educational reflection as a science: the double marginalization of Experimental Pedagogy
II. Discourses and practices structuring the field of Adult Education
2.1. The philosophical underpinnings of current adult education
2.2. The dominant theoretical discourses in the field of adult education
2.3. The current challenges of adult education
III. The contemporary research on adult education
3.1. Non-formal education and adult education: epistemological turn and training practices implications
3.2. Training and Work: from functionalism towards a mediation epistemology
3.3. Prior Learning Recognition (PLAR) and adult education
3.4. Public policy and adult education in Portugal: trends and challenges
The pedagogical approach implies a combination between lectures, with an emphasis on a logic of exposition and dialogue, and a component of students autonomous work, allowing the extension and deepening of knowledge of the literature focusing on the analysis of socio-historical processes of production of a scientific approach in the educational field and with the problems of the contemporary field of adult education.
In this sense, the teaching methodologies are organized as follows:
1. Lectures:
Presentation and Debate (35 h).
Analysis and discussion of the diverse themes of the syllabus contribution to the understanding of scientific work in education and adult education contemporary issues (10 h).
2. Autonomous study:
- Tutorials (7h.)
- Literature search (20 h)
- Reading and review of the literature of the scientific field (50 h)
- Production of written essays on the issues explored in the scientific literature (20h.)
- Evaluation (20 h).
| designation | Weight (%) |
|---|---|
| Trabalho escrito | 100,00 |
| Total: | 100,00 |
| designation | Time (hours) |
|---|---|
| Estudo autónomo | 90,00 |
| Frequência das aulas | 45,00 |
| Trabalho de investigação | 27,00 |
| Total: | 162,00 |
The adopted assessment regime implies the legally established (75% of attendance) attendance in the course, with the exceptions of the students refered in the number 4 of the article 9º of the Assessment statute
The adopted assessment regime is distributed evaluation with final exam. The students achievement is assessed through an individual assignment (rated on a scale of 0 to 20). The assignment may take up to 15 pages long and it is intended to refer some of the issues addressed in the curricular unit or to integrate the mode of analysis proposed in the approach of thematic or objects from other curricular units of the Master's degree.
Achieving a rating of less than 8 in the individual assignment entails taking a final exam.
Does not apply
Written examen about the thematics refered in the syllabus
.