Inhaler identification: evaluating a potential screening method for adherence in chronic respiratory disease management

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2025

Authors

Gomes, DS (Author) Other; Seixas, C (Author) FEP; Cravo, J (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Jornal Brasileiro de Pneumologia

Vol. 51

ISSN: 1806-3713

Publisher: Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisiologia

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-019-KWG

DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20250393

Abstract (EN): Objectives: This study explores the relationship between inhaler visual identification, naming, and adherence outcomes, and evaluates the potential of combining these factors into a screening tool for identifying poor adherence. Methods: This observational, prospective study included adult patients with COPD, asthma, or asthma+COPD who had been on chronic inhalation therapy for at least the past year. Data were collected through patient interviews and medical records. Adherence was assessed using the Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) questionnaire and prescription records, calculated as the Proportion of Days Covered (PDC). The patients completed a questionnaire to evaluate their ability to visually identify and name their inhalers. Results: Among the 196 participants, significant differences in adherence levels were observed across the COPD, asthma, and asthma+COPD groups, with COPD patients demonstrating higher adherence rates (p=0.001). Concordance between TAI and PDC was highest in the COPD group (75.0%), compared to the asthma (51.3%) and asthma+COPD (55.5%) groups. Correct naming of inhalers was not significantly correlated with adherence. However, correct inhaler visual identification was associated with better adherence. Incorrect visual identification showed low sensitivity (15.9%) but high specificity (92.6%) for detecting poorly adherent patients. Conclusions: The ability to visually identify inhalers was associated with better adherence, while the ability to name inhalers was not. Although incorrect visual identification has limited utility as a screening tool, it may still serve as a rapid and practical method for identifying poorly adherent patients in clinical practice.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 8