The International Collaboration of Pharmacy Journal Editors (ICPJE) formally constituted to foster quality around clinical and social pharmacy practice research publications

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2025

Authors

F Alves Da Costa (Author) Other; F Fernández-Llimós (Author) FFUP; S Desselle (Author) Other; I Arnet (Author) Other; Z Babar (Author) Other; C Bond (Author) Other; F Alves Da Costa (Author) Other; M Cordina (Author) Other; V Garcia Cardenas (Author) Other; MS El-Hajj (Author) Other; R Jacobsen (Author) Other; AV Law (Author) Other; LS Nørgaard (Author) Other; C Polidori (Author) Other; N Shcherbakova (Author) Other; D Stewart (Author) Other; FS Tonin (Author) Other; AE Weidmann (Author) Other

Journal

The Journal is awaiting validation by the Administrative Services.

Title: FARMACEUTICOS COMUNITARIOS

Vol. 17

Pages: 3-5

ISSN: 1885-8619

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-018-HHS

DOI: 10.33620/fc.2173-9218.(2025).08

Abstract (EN): The Granada statements were a result of the need to strengthen clinical, social and administrative pharmacy practice as an area of knowledge that translates into practice, research and policy. As a response, a group of clinical and social pharmacy practice journal editors launched an initiative in Granada in 2022 to discuss ways to improve the quality of publications in this area, which culminated in the Granada statements. Eighteen statements were developed, clustered into six main domains:1) the appropriate use of terminology; 2) developing impactful abstracts; 3) having the required peer reviews; 4) preventing journal scattering; 5) more effective and wiser use of journal and article performance metrics; and 6)authors' selection of the most appropriate pharmacy practice journal to submit their work. The full Granada statements have been published in 14 journals [1-14]. These pioneering statements are rooted in similar endeavors undertaken by scholars in other health professions groups, fostering the concept of interdisciplinary consensus and advancing scientific paradigm [15, 16].

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 3