One-class classification with confound control for cognitive screening in older adults using gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2025

Authors

Guimaraes, V (Author) Other; Sousa, I (Author) Other; Cunha, R (Author) Other; Magalhaes, R (Author) Other; Machado, A (Author) Other; Fernandes, V (Author) Other; Reis, S (Author) Other; Correia, M. V. (Author) FEUP

Journal

Title: Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Vol. 259

ISSN: 0169-2607

Publisher: Elsevier

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-017-GS4

DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2024.108508

Abstract (EN): Background and Objectives: Early detection of cognitive impairment is crucial for timely clinical interventions aimed at delaying progression to dementia. However, existing screening tools are not ideal for wide population screening. This study explores the potential of combining machine learning, specifically, one-class classification, with simpler and quicker motor-cognitive tasks to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment. Methods: We gathered data on gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks from older adults with mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls. Using one-class classification, we modeled the behavior of the majority group (healthy controls), identifying deviations from this behavior as abnormal. To account for confounding effects, we integrated confound regression into the classification pipeline. We evaluated the performance of individual tasks, as well as the combination of features (early fusion) and models (late fusion). Additionally, we compared the results with those from two-class classification and a standard cognitive screening test. Results: We analyzed data from 37 healthy controls and 16 individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Results revealed that one-class classification had higher predictive accuracy for mild cognitive impairment, whereas two-class classification performed better in identifying healthy controls. Gait features yielded the best results for one-class classification. Combining individual models led to better performance than combining features from the different tasks. Notably, the one-class majority voting approach exhibited a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 75.7%, suggesting it may serve as a potential alternative to the standard cognitive screening test. In contrast, the two-class majority voting failed to improve the low sensitivities achieved by the individual models due to the underrepresentation of the impaired group. Conclusion: Our preliminary results support the use of one-class classification with confound control to detect abnormal patterns of gait, fingertapping, cognitive, and dual tasks, to improve the early detection of cognitive impairment. Further research is necessary to substantiate the method's effectiveness in broader clinical settings.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 13