Towards an intelligent medical system for the aesthetic evaluation of breast cancer conservative treatment

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2007

Authors

Jaime S Cardso (Author) FEUP; Maria J Cardos (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Vol. 40 No. 2

Pages: 115-126

ISSN: 0933-3657

Publisher: Elsevier

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 97 Citations

ISI Web of Science

Scopus - 112 Citations

Scientific classification

CORDIS: Technological sciences > Technology > Medical technology

FOS: Engineering and technology > Environmental biotechnology

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-004-9HG

DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2007.02.007

Abstract (EN): Objective: This work presents a novel approach for the automated prediction of the aesthetic result of breast cancer conservative treatment (BCCT). Cosmetic assessment plays a major rote in the study of BCCT. Objective assessment methods are being preferred to overcome the drawbacks of subjective evaluation. Methodology: The problem is addressed as a pattern recognition task. A dataset of images of patients was classified in four classes (excellent, good, fair, poor) by a panel of international experts, providing a gold standard classification. As possible types of objective features we considered those already identified by domain experts as relevant to the aesthetic evaluation of the surgical procedure, namely those assessing breast asymmetry, skin colour difference and scar visibility. A classifier based on support vector machines was developed from objective features extracted from the reference dataset. Results: A correct classification rate of about 70% was obtained when categorizing a set of unseen images into the aforementioned four classes. This accuracy is comparable with the result of the best evaluator from the panel of experts. Conclusion: The results obtained are rather encouraging and the developed tool, could be very helpful in assuring objective assessment of the aesthetic outcome of BCCT.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 12