Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Annotating Arguments in a Corpus of Opinion Articles
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

Annotating Arguments in a Corpus of Opinion Articles

Title
Annotating Arguments in a Corpus of Opinion Articles
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2022
Authors
Rocha, G
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Trigo, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Sousa-Silva, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Carvalho, P
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Martins, B
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Won, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 1890-1899
LREC 2022: Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, 13
Marseille, 2022
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00X-9M5
Abstract (EN): Interest in argument mining has resulted in an increasing number of argument annotated corpora. However, most focus on English texts with explicit argumentative discourse markers, such as persuasive essays or legal documents. Conversely, we report on the first extensive and consolidated Portuguese argument annotation project focused on opinion articles. We briefly describe the annotation guidelines based on a multi-layered process and analyze the manual annotations produced, highlighting the main challenges of this textual genre. We then conduct a comprehensive inter-annotator agreement analysis, including argumentative discourse units, their classes and relations, and resulting graphs. This analysis reveals that each of these aspects tackles very different kinds of challenges. We observe differences in annotator profiles, motivating our aim of producing a non-aggregated corpus containing the insights of every annotator. We note that the interpretation and identification of token-level arguments is challenging; nevertheless, tasks that focus on higher-level components of the argument structure can obtain considerable agreement. We lay down perspectives on corpus usage, exploiting its multi-faceted nature.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 10
Documents
File name Description Size
2022.lrec-1.201[1] 797.02 KB
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-23 at 05:15:10 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book