Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Hunner lesion disease differs in diagnosis, treatment and outcome from bladder pain syndrome: an ESSIC working group report
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

Hunner lesion disease differs in diagnosis, treatment and outcome from bladder pain syndrome: an ESSIC working group report

Title
Hunner lesion disease differs in diagnosis, treatment and outcome from bladder pain syndrome: an ESSIC working group report
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Fall, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Nordling, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Cervigni, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Paulo Dinis
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Fariello, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Hanno, P
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Kalojorn Gustafsson, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Logadottir, Y
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Meijlink, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Mishra, N
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Moldwin, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Nasta, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Quaghebeur, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Ratner, V
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Sairanen, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Taneja, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Tomoe, H
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Ueda, T
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wennevik, G
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Whitmore, K
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wyndaele, JJ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Zaitcev, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
The Journal is awaiting validation by the Administrative Services.
Vol. 54
Pages: 91-98
ISSN: 2168-1805
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00R-TX2
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Objectives: There is confusion about the terms of bladder pain syndrome (BPS) and Interstitial Cystitis (IC). The European Society for the Study of IC (ESSIC) classified these according to objective findings [9]. One phenotype, Hunner lesion disease (HLD or ESSIC 3C) differs markedly from other presentations. Therefore, the question was raised as to whether this is a separate condition or BPS subtype. Methods: An evaluation was made to explore if HLD differs from other BPS presentations regarding symptomatology, physical examination findings, laboratory tests, endoscopy, histopathology, natural history, epidemiology, prognosis and treatment outcomes. Results: Cystoscopy is the method of choice to identify Hunner lesions, histopathology the method to confirm it. You cannot distinguish between main forms of BPS by means of symptoms, physical examination or laboratory tests. Epidemiologic data are incomplete. HLD seems relatively uncommon, although more frequent in older patients than non-HLD. No indication has been presented of BPS and HLD as a continuum of conditions, one developing into the other. Conclusions: A paradigm shift in the understanding of BPS/IC is urgent. A highly topical issue is to separate HLD and BPS: treatment results and prognoses differ substantially. Since historically, IC was tantamount to Hunner lesions and interstitial inflammation in the bladder wall, still, a valid definition, the term IC should preferably be reserved for HLD patients. BPS is a symptom syndrome without specific objective findings and should be used for other patients fulfilling the ESSIC definitions.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 8
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Comments to Editorial by J. Curtis Nickel. It is premature to categorize Hunner lesion interstitial cystitis as a distinct disease entity. Scandinavian Journal of Urology 2020, Vol. 54, No. 2, 99-100; https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2020.1744714 (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Fall, M; Nordling, J; Cervigni, M; Paulo Dinis; Fariello, J; Hanno, P; Kabjorn Gustafsson, C; Logadottir, Y; Meijlink, J; Moldwin, R; Nasta, L; Quaghebeur, J; Sairanen, J; Taneja, R; Tomoe, H; Ueda, T; Wennevik, GE; Wyndaele, JJ; Zaitcev, A
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-23 at 09:59:57 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book