Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > A Cautionary Tale on Using Covid-19 Data for Machine Learning
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

A Cautionary Tale on Using Covid-19 Data for Machine Learning

Title
A Cautionary Tale on Using Covid-19 Data for Machine Learning
Type
Chapter or Part of a Book
Year
2021
Authors
Nogueira-Leite, D
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Alves, JM
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Marques-Cruz, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Ricardo Cruz Correia
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Book
Pages: 265-275
ISBN: 978-3-030-77210-9
Electronic ISBN: 978-3-030-77211-6
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00V-364
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Introduction: Good quality and real-time epidemiological COVID-19 data are paramount to fight this pandemic through statistical/machine-learning based decision-making support mechanisms. Aims: Evaluate the resources available and used to gather COVID-19 epidemiological data by Portuguese health authorities from the onset of the pandemic until December 2020. The analysis laid on two main topics: (a) work processes at the Public Health Unit (PHU) level and (b) registry forms for epidemiological reporting and control procedures. Recommendations on requirements to overcome problems related to data integration and interoperability in order to build robust decision-making support mechanisms will also be produced. Methods: For topic (a), we revised the Portuguese Directorate-General of Health (DGS) guidelines for data treatment. For topic (b), we analysed the forms used during first and second waves, while comparing them with DGS metadata provided to researchers. Results: On topic (a), we detected the use of two complementary and non-interoperable systems. Further, the workflow does not seem to promote data quality and facilitates the occurrence of communication problems between health professionals. On topic (b), we found 27 deleted questions, 6 new questions, 1 displaced question, and 1 text modification between the 2 form versions. Discussion: Both the workflow and data gathering methods are not the best suited for the generation of good quality data. They do not effectively support Public Health Professionals (PHP) nor provide the elements for posterior data analysis. The use of data by decision-making support mechanisms demands a careful planning of the data used to depict reality, and this condition is not met by the currently used forms. © 2021, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-31 at 07:09:31 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book