Comparison of chickpea rhizobia isolates from diverse Portuguese natural populations based on symbiotic effectiveness and DNA fingerprint

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2002

Authors

Laranjo, M (Author) Other; Branco, C (Author) Other; soares, r (Author) FMDUP; Alho, L (Author) Other; Carvalho, MDE (Author) Other; Oliveira, S (Author) Other

Journal

Title: JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY

Vol. 92

Pages: 1043-1050

ISSN: 1364-5072

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 19 Citations

Scopus - 23 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-000-RE5

DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01615.x

Abstract (EN): Aims: To test the hypothesis that differences in chickpea yields obtained in four distinct Portuguese regions (Beja, Elvas-Casas Velhas , Elvas-Estacao Nacional de Melhoramento de Plantas (ENMP) and Evora) could be due to variation between the natural rhizobia populations. Methods and Results: Estimation of the size of the different rhizobial populations showed that Elvas-ENMP population was the largest one. Elvas-ENMP population also revealed a higher proportion of isolates carrying more than one plasmid. Assessment of genetic diversity of the native rhizobia populations by a DNA fingerprinting PCR method, here designated as DAPD (Direct Amplified Polymorphic DNA), showed a higher degree of variation in Elvas-ENMP and Beja populations. The symbiotic effectiveness (SE) of 39 isolates was determined and ranged 13-34%. Statistical analysis showed that SE was negatively correlated with plasmid number of the isolate. Conclusions: The largest indigenous rhizobia population was found in Elvas-ENMP. DAPD pattern and plasmid profile analysis both suggested a higher genetic diversity among the populations of Elvas-ENMP and Beja. No relationship was found between SE of the isolates and their origin site. Significance and Impact of Study: The large native population, rather than the symbiotic performance of individual rhizobia, could contribute to the higher chickpea yields obtained in Elvas-ENMP.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 8