Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Interviewer effects when investigating abuse were not compatible with effect modification but instead with confounding
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

Interviewer effects when investigating abuse were not compatible with effect modification but instead with confounding

Title
Interviewer effects when investigating abuse were not compatible with effect modification but instead with confounding
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2013
Authors
Sílvia Fraga
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Costa, D
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Barros H
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 66
Pages: 911-918
ISSN: 0895-4356
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-006-8SD
Abstract (EN): Objectives: To describe interviewer-related variability in abuse estimates and assess the nature of the interviewer effects on the associations between elder abuse and covariates. Study Design and Setting: After intensive training, six interviewers administered structured questionnaires through face-to-face interviews to assess abuse in a population-based sample of 641 Portuguese individuals aged 60-84 years. Results: The overall prevalence of abuse victimization during the previous year was 28.1%, but it differed significantly according to the interviewer, ranging from 16.9% to 36.8%. There was no statistical effect modification introduced by the interviewer on the association of abuse and its determinants. Additionally, interviewer-level variables (empathy and violence beliefs) showed no significant contribution to explain the variance attributable to potential interviewer effects. Adjusting for the interviewer had little or no effect on the odds ratio of abuse for gender, age, education, and quality of life. However, the interviewer introduced relevant confounding of the associations between abuse and other sensitive topics, such as somatic complaints. Conclusion: Although no relevant effect modification was observed, this study emphasizes the importance of the interviewer as a relevant confounder when estimating associations between sensitive variables, as it is the case of elder abuse.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 8
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Observer reliability and agreement: differences, difficulties, and controversies (2011)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Cristina Costa Santos; Joao Bemardes; Diogo Ayres de Campos
Epidemiologic practice and conduct guidelines: a new kid on the block (2018)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Barros H
Cumulative incidence estimates in the presence of competing risks (2018)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Morais, S; Antunes, L; Bento, MJ; Lunet N
The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement (2011)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Cristina Costa Santos; Joao Bernardes; Diogo Ayres de Campos; Antonia Costa; Celia Costa
Self-reported data on reproductive variables were reliable among postmenopausal women (2008)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Lucas, R; Azevedo A; Barros H

See all (10)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-07 at 02:41:41 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book