Quality of coding within clinical datasets: A case-study using burn-related hospitalizations

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2019

Authors

Souza, J (Author) Other; Santos, JV (Author) Other; Lopes F (Author) FMUP; Freitas A (Author) FMUP

Journal

Title: Burns

Vol. 45

Pages: 1571-1584

ISSN: 0305-4179

Publisher: Elsevier

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 3 Citations

Scopus - 5 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00R-4D1

DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2018.09.013

Abstract (EN): The quality of clinical data held in administrative databases is crucial for appropriate funding of health care services. As Diagnosis-Related Groups (DRGs) continue to play an important role in hospital payment mechanisms, proper coding of diagnoses and procedures is of most concern. This study used an administrative, nationwide Portuguese inpatient database to characterize and assess coding patterns in burn-related hospitalization data, with a special focus on identifying suspected miscoding practices that could be affecting APR-DRG (All-Patient Refined Diagnosis-Related Groups) classification. Using coded clinical data of 4,182 burn-related admissions occurred between 2011 and 2015, we compared APR-DRG and Severity of Illness (SOI) frequencies between hospitals with a burn unit in Portugal. The frequencies of individual diagnosis and procedure codes among episodes grouped within the same APR-DRG were also compared. Hospitals with a burn unit in Portugal differed significantly in the frequencies of APR-DRGs 842 and 844. Proper coding of extensive third-degree burns might be related with the observed discrepant frequencies of APR-DRGs across the evaluated hospitals. Facilities also differed significantly concerning the proportions of SOI levels in certain APR-DRGs. Significant differences in reporting certain comorbidities and common hospital procedures, especially non-operating room procedures, might have influenced the observed discrepancies in SOI levels. Moreover, there seems to be a lack of standard in coding debridement procedures among the evaluated hospitals. Overall, we found some suspected coding patterns that could potentially be associated with miscoding practices impacting APR-DRG classification. Those findings could not only be relevant for planning future audit processes and improving medical coding practices, but also for discussing quality and desirable features of burn-related clinical data, keeping in mind their use for other purposes beyond DRG grouping, namely clinical and health care services research, as well as health care management.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 14