Abstract (EN):
This paper explores a model in which the agent's effort affects (solely) the precision (variance) of a performance measure (signal) of the outcome. Both the principal and the agent are risk averse. The contract the principal offers is composed of a fixed payment plus variable compensation, depending on the outcome and based on a (linear) risk-sharing rule between the principal and the agent. Moral hazard alone leads to an upward distortion (above the first-best) of the risk-sharing rule. This serves to induce more effort to increase information precision. Adverse selection alone introduces two new features. First, to reduce informational rents, the risk-sharing rule is distorted downward below the first-best. Second, to induce truthful information revelation, the risk-sharing rule becomes increasing with the expected outcome-the agent's private information. When moral hazard and adverse selection are considered together, and there is enough uncertainty related to adverse selection, the risk-sharing rule is above the first-best for more efficient types, but below the first-best for less efficient types. Further, the precision of the signal increases with the expected outcome.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific
No. of pages:
16