Authors, peer reviewers, and readers: What is expected from each player in collaborative publishing?

• Type: Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2021

Authors

Fernandez-Llimos, F (Author) FFUP

Journal

Title: Pharmacy Practice

Vol. 19

Pages: 1-6

ISSN: 1885-642X

Publisher: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 13 Citations

Scopus - 11 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00T-9YQ

DOI: 10.18549/pharmpract.2021.1.2284

Abstract (EN): Scholarly publishing is in a crisis, with the many stakeholders complaining about different aspects of the system. Authors want fast publication times, high visibility and publications in high-impact journals. Readers want freely accessible, high-quality articles. Peer reviewers want recognition for the work they perform to ensure the quality of the published articles. However, authors, peer reviewers, and readers are three different roles played by the same group of individuals, the users of the scholarly publishing system-and this system could work based on a collaborative publishing principle where "nobody pays, and nobody gets paid".

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 6