Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > A comparative study on the running safety of trains subjected to crosswinds simulated with different wind models
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

A comparative study on the running safety of trains subjected to crosswinds simulated with different wind models

Title
A comparative study on the running safety of trains subjected to crosswinds simulated with different wind models
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Heleno, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Carvalho, H
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Baker, CJ
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 207
ISSN: 0167-6105
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00S-TFV
Abstract (EN): This article presents a study on the train stability against crosswinds simulated with different wind models. The work focuses on the evaluation of derailment indexes, which are dependent on the wheel-rail contact forces obtained through dynamic analyses performed with a vehicle-structure interaction methodology. The results obtained using the normative European Committee for Standardization (CEN) Discrete Gust model are compared with those obtained with a turbulent wind model based on stochastically generated wind fields. The calculations are performed considering several heights above the terrain to simulate the behaviour of a train running over a bridge deck located at different elevations. The CEN Discrete Gust model proved to be inaccurate and increasingly conservative, in relation to the Turbulent Wind model, as the height above the ground increases, since the former is based on a fixed turbulence intensity corresponding to the ground level, while the latter considers the correct turbulence intensity dependent on the deck elevation. Based on these results, the present article describes an alternative discrete gust approach that takes into consideration the variable turbulence intensity and terrain category in order to improve its applicability in the evaluation of the train running safety on bridges with decks located at different heights.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 15
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Simulation of forest fire spread using a two-way coupling algorithm and its application to a real wildfire (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Lopes, AMG; Ribeiro, LM; Viegas, DX; Raposo, JR
Numerical simulation of the atmospheric flow in a mountainous region of the North of Portugal (1998)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Maurizi, A; José Laginha Palma; Castro, FA
Linear and nonlinear models in wind resource assessment and wind turbine micro-siting in complex terrain (2008)
Article in International Scientific Journal
J.M.L.M. Palma ; F.A. Castro; L.F. Ribeiro; A. H. Rodrigues; A.P. Pinto
Influence of the railway vehicle properties in the running safety against crosswinds (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
R. Heleno; P. A. Montenegro; H. Carvalho; D. Ribeiro; Rui Calçada; C. J. Baker
Impact of the train-track-bridge system characteristics in the runnability of high-speed trains against crosswinds-Part I: Running safety (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Pedro Aires Montenegro; Carvalho, H; Ortega, M; Millanes, F; Goicolea, JM; Zhai, W; Rui Calçada

See all (10)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-09-08 at 08:40:57 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book