Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility

Title
Active accessibility: A review of operational measures of walking and cycling accessibility
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2016
Authors
Vale, David S.
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Saraiva, Miguel Marinho
(Author)
FLUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications Without AUTHENTICUS View ORCID page
Pereira, Mauro
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 9 No. 1
Pages: 209-235
ISSN: 1938-7849
Other information
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): Active travel is enthusiastically promoted in the Western world due to its clear and demonstrated individual and collective benefits. While active travel has been shown to be associated with features of the built environment such as density and land-use mix, it is also associated with walking and cycling accessibility—which we designate as active accessibility. However, the measurement of active accessibility is not straightforward and it can represent significantly different features of the built environment. This paper presents an extensive review of published research that measures active accessibility. We classified the literature into four categories based on the methodology used: distance-based, gravity-based or potential, topological or infrastructure-based, and walkability and walk score-type measures. A fifth category was created to classify outliers consisting of distinct methodological approaches or hybrids of the four main categories. We argue that almost all of these methods have conceptual and computational limitations, and that there are inconsistencies in the use of concepts and terms. Furthermore, no sensitivity analysis was carried out on the selected parameters. We conclude by presenting some guidelines that might improve the value and clarity of active accessibility research, theory, and practice.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Documents
File name Description Size
593-Article Text-3885-1-10-20160429 756.13 KB
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Accessibility instruments for planning practice: A review of European experiences (2016)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Cecília Silva; Enrica Papa; Marco te Brömmelstroet; Angela Hull
Public transport strategy: Minimal service vs. competitor to the car (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Cecília Silva; Cadima, C; Castro, N; Tennoy, A
Agglomeration economies, accessibility and the spatial choice behavior of relocating firms (2010)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Michiel de Bok; Frank van Oort
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-14 at 18:13:45 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book