Multi-model ensembles for assessment of flood losses and associated uncertainty

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2018

Authors

Figueiredo, R (Author) Other; Schroeter, K (Author) Other; Weiss Motz, A (Author) Other; Martina, MLV (Author) Other; Kreibich, H (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences

Vol. 18

Pages: 1297-1314

ISSN: 1561-8633

Publisher: Copernicus

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 9 Citations

Scopus - 23 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00R-CGS

DOI: 10.5194/nhess-18-1297-2018

Abstract (EN): Flood loss modelling is a crucial part of risk assessments. However, it is subject to large uncertainty that is often neglected. Most models available in the literature are deterministic, providing only single point estimates of flood loss, and large disparities tend to exist among them. Adopting any one such model in a risk assessment context is likely to lead to inaccurate loss estimates and sub-optimal decision-making. In this paper, we propose the use of multi-model ensembles to address these issues. This approach, which has been applied successfully in other scientific fields, is based on the combination of different model outputs with the aim of improving the skill and usefulness of predictions. We first propose a model rating framework to support ensemble construction, based on a probability tree of model properties, which establishes relative degrees of belief between candidate models. Using 20 flood loss models in two test cases, we then construct numerous multi-model ensembles, based both on the rating framework and on a stochastic method, differing in terms of participating members, ensemble size and model weights. We evaluate the performance of ensemble means, as well as their probabilistic skill and reliability. Our results demonstrate that well-designed multi-model ensembles represent a pragmatic approach to consistently obtain more accurate flood loss estimates and reliable probability distributions of model uncertainty.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 18