Go to:
Logótipo
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > High Voltage Monophasic Pulsed Current (HVMPC) for stage II-IV pressure ulcer healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Map of Premises
Principal
Publication

High Voltage Monophasic Pulsed Current (HVMPC) for stage II-IV pressure ulcer healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Title
High Voltage Monophasic Pulsed Current (HVMPC) for stage II-IV pressure ulcer healing. A systematic review and meta-analysis
Type
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Year
2018
Authors
Beshoy Girgis
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 27 No. 4
Pages: 274-284
ISSN: 0965-206X
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations
Publicação em Scopus Scopus - 0 Citations
Scientific classification
FOS: Social sciences
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00P-PWQ
Abstract (EN): This review was conducted to determine and quantify the efficacy of high-voltage monophasic pulsed current (HVMPC) in the treatment of stage II-IV pressure ulcers (PrUs), identify the details of HVMPC intervention parameters and the superior protocol, and ascertain other potential benefits and the safety of HVMPC intervention. Eleven studies, nine randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two case series studies, matched the criteria and were included in the systematic review, whereas, only level 1 evidence RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The percentage of wound surface area reduction per week was 12.39%; 95% CI, [10.43-14.371 for HVMPC plus standard wound care (SWC) and 6.96%; 95% CI, [5.56-8.38] for SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC. The net effect of HVMPC was 5.4% per week (an increase of 78% greater than SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC). Level 1, 2 and 4 evidence studies have consistently indicated that HVMPC plus SWC were more effective than SWC alone or SWC plus sham HVMPC in treating stage II-IV PrUs. Level 1 evidence studies showed that HVMPC intervention improved the healing of PrUs (reduced wound surface area), and combined with SWC, increased the probability of complete healing and almost eliminated the probability of worsening of healing. HVMPC intervention was shown to be relatively safe, with rare adverse reactions.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 11
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

Physical therapy for tendinopathy: An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Beshoy Girgis; José Alberto Duarte
Indicators of physical stress during hindlimb suspension in Wistar rats (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Maurilio Tiradentes Dutra; Beshoy Girgis; Antonio Bovolini; Catarina C. Costa; Grace Fernanda Nunes; José Alberto R. Duarte
Fast-twitch muscle fibers hypertrophy is hampered by antioxidant supplementation during atrophy rehabilitation in rats (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Maurilio T. Dutra; Beshoy Girgis; Antonio Bovolini; José Alberto R. Duarte
Efficacy of physical therapy interventions for chronic lateral elbow tendinopathy: A systematic review (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Beshoy Girgis; José Alberto Duarte
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Medicina Dentária da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-13 at 07:44:01 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing | Electronic Yellow Book