Production of Teaching Materials in French

Code:

MEIEFA012

Acronym:

PMDF

Keywords
Classification	Keyword
OFICIAL	Didactics

Instance: 2021/2022 - 2S

Active?	Yes
Responsible unit:	Department of Portuguese and Romance Studies
Course/CS Responsible:	Teaching English and Foreign Languages in the 3rd cycle of Basic Education and in Secondary Education, with specialties in Spanish or French or German

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym	No. of Students	Study Plan	Curricular Years	Credits UCN	Credits ECTS	Contact hours	Total Time
MEIEFA	3	MEIEFA - Study Plan	1	-	3	26	81
MEPIEFA	2	MEPIEFA - Study Plan	1	-	3	26	81

Teaching language

Portuguese and French

Objectives

 

The goals of this course lead to the acquisition by students of analysis skills and evaluation of teaching materials, giving them valid instruments for such, and allowing applications in specific contexts of teaching and learning.

Learning outcomes and competences

 

At the end of the course students should be able to:

a) analyse teaching materials, using a sustained theoretical grid of analysis;

b) choose and / or adapt teaching materials according to the situation of teaching and learning;

c) produce supplementary materials, taking into account specific factors (level, group, context and learning purposes).

Working method

B-learning

Program

 

1. Teaching material: definition, conception, application and evaluation

 

2. Criteria and tools for the analysis of teaching material

 

3. The diversity of teaching material

 

3.1. From textbook to homegrown materials

 

3.2. Teaching materials and non didactic materials with educational uses

 

3.3. Potential uses of authentic documents in FL

 

4. Multimedia teaching materials: ICT use as a source and as a tool

 

5 .Producing materials for the development and / or deepening of skills (comprehension and oral production, reading, writing, grammatical competence, FL culture)

Mandatory literature

AAVV; Revue Education & Formation. Manuels scolaires et matériels didactiques, Université de Mons, 2010
Depover, C., Karsenti, T., & Komis, V. ; Enseigner avec les technologies : favoriser les apprentissages, développer des compétence, Presses de l'Université du Québec, 2007
Johnson, Keith; Designing language teaching tasks. ISBN: 0-333-98486-2
Lebrun, Johanne et al. ; Le matériel didactique et pédagogique : soutien à l'appropriation ou déterminant de l'intervention éducative, presses de l'Université du laval, 2006
Leffa, Vilson J. ; Como produzir materiais para o ensino de línguas, http://www.leffa.pro.br/textos/trabalhos/prod_mat.pdf.
Tomlinson, Brian 340; Materials development in language teaching. ISBN: 0-521-57419-6

Complementary Bibliography

Riquois, Estelle; Évolutions méthodologiques des manuels et matériels didactiques complémentaires en FLE, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278622300_Evolutions_methodologiques_des_manuels_et_materiels_didactiques_complementaires_en_FLE, 2010

Comments from the literature

Supplementary bibliography will be given throughout the semester.

Teaching methods and learning activities

Lectures, seminars and tutorials (analysing, discussing and producing teaching materials). Active student participation will be regarded as fundamental for an adequate fulfillment of the course's goals.

Software

Moodle

keywords

Humanities > language sciences > Languages > Modern languages > European languages > Romance languages

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

Designation	Weight (%)
Participação presencial	30,00
Trabalho escrito	70,00
Total:	100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation	Time (hours)
Estudo autónomo	31,00
Frequência das aulas	20,00
Trabalho escrito	30,00
Total:	81,00

Eligibility for exams

Attending 75% of classes, unless established otherwise by law.

Calculation formula of final grade

The evaluation will consider active participation in the sessions and in the Moodle platform (30%), a written analysis of a teaching material (35%) and a production of a teaching material (35%).
Nota bene: For a successful evaluation in the course unit, the student can not have a rating lower than 9 in the written evaluation components and the average of the two components should be positive.

Classification improvement

The assessment component to be considered for the purpose of improving the classification should be one of the written assessment component (to be chosen by the student).