Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > MEFILO001

Ethics and education

Code: MEFILO001     Acronym: ETED

Keywords
Classification Keyword
OFICIAL General Education Training

Instance: 2021/2022 - 1S

Active? Yes
Responsible unit: Department of Philosophy
Course/CS Responsible: Teaching Philosophy in Secondary Education

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym No. of Students Study Plan Curricular Years Credits UCN Credits ECTS Contact hours Total Time
MEFILO 15 MEFILO - Study Plan 1 - 3 21,5 81
MEI 0 MEI - Study Plan 1 - 3 21,5 81
MEPLAT 0 MEPLAT - Study Plan 1 - 3 21,5 81

Teaching language

Suitable for English-speaking students

Objectives

1.To question specific relationships between ethics and deontology on the contemporary educational field

2.To recognize the complexity of the approached problematic, developing autonomous skills of reflection, intervention and research

3.Develop skills of analysis and critical thinking around educational problematic of otherness

4.Develop skills of analysis and critical thinking around educational problematic of otherness

5.Recognizing and valuingthe relational dimensionof the pedagogical relation as an enhancing space of human development.

6.To understand the scientific basis, the political purposes and the ethical demands of the educational deontology

 



Learning outcomes and competences

At the end of UC students should recognize and value the relational dimension of the pedagogical relationship as enhancer space of human development, taking a critical position on the scientific assumptions , political purposes and the ethical requirements of professional conduct educational proficiency.

Working method

Presencial

Program

1. Fundamental concepts and problematizations
1.1. Ethics and Moral 1.2. Education and Pedagogy
1.3. Training and Ethics

 

 

2. Ethical questioning and educational action 2.1. Education as anthropological question
2.2. Pedagogical models and purposes in education
2.2.1 Education and otherness: identity, diversity and difference
2.2.2. The educational relationship in question

 

3. Ethics and professional identity
3.1. Fundamental ethical principles and professionalism
3.2. The practice of teaching: from social representation to personal perception 3.3. Ethical dilemmas in teacher professional performance

Mandatory literature

Baptista, Isabel; Dar rosto ao futuro. ISBN: 972-8562-15-2
Bertrand, Yves; Teorias contemporâneas da educação. ISBN: 972-771-398-X
BRAGA, F., ; Formação de Professores e Identidade Profissional, Quarteto Editora, 2001
COUTO, Maria João; Da Comunicação entre as diferenças. Reflexões em torno da educação social e do seu sentido contemporâneo, FLUP, 1996
CUNHA, P. D’Orey,; Ética e Educação, UCP, 1996
ESTRELA, M.T., e CAETANO, A. P. (coords),; Ética Profissional Docente. Do pensamento dos professores à sua formação, Educa, 2010
KENNETH, A., et. al.,; The Ethics of Teaching, Teachers College Press, 2004
LABARRIERE, P-J; Discours de l'altérité, PUF, 1983
Pourtois, Jean-Pierre; A^educação pós-moderna. ISBN: 972-771-109-X
Quintana Cabanas, Jose Maria; Teoria da educação. ISBN: 972-41-2813-X
TRINDADE, Rui; Escola, Poder e Saber: a relação pedagógica em debate. , Livpsic, 2009

Teaching methods and learning activities

Lectures, supported by analysis of extracts from key works mentioned in the bibliography, as a basis for

discussion of the subject matter presented; production of brief written comments on the topics discussed in class;

critical review on a relevant study in the subjects addressed; written work, performed under the guidance of the

professor, to be presented orally in class.

 

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Participação presencial 20,00
Prova oral 30,00
Trabalho escrito 50,00
Total: 100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation Time (hours)
Estudo autónomo 60,00
Frequência das aulas 52,00
Trabalho de investigação 50,00
Total: 162,00

Eligibility for exams

N/a

Calculation formula of final grade

Critical review of a selected work (30%); work attendance (20%), paper (20%), oral presentation (30%).


R30%+TP 20%+TE 20%+AO30%=100%

Examinations or Special Assignments

n/a

Classification improvement

Critical review of a selected work (30%);paper (20%),


R30%+TE 20%=50%

Recommend this page Top