Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > MEBI006

Supervised Teaching Practice I

Code: MEBI006     Acronym: IPP

Keywords
Classification Keyword
OFICIAL Teacher Training

Instance: 2019/2020 - 2S Ícone do Moodle

Active? Yes
E-learning page: http://moodle.up.pt/
Responsible unit: Department of Anglo-American Studies
Course/CS Responsible: Teaching English in the 1st cycle of Basic Education

Cycles of Study/Courses

Acronym No. of Students Study Plan Curricular Years Credits UCN Credits ECTS Contact hours Total Time
MEBI 11 MEBI - Study Plan 1 - 6 58,5 162

Teaching language

English

Objectives




  1. To develop understanding of the primary school context and the competences required of teachers through direct observation of practices;

  2. To develop student-teacher's ability to be a reflective practitioner;

  3. To develop competences for classroom observation;

  4. To develop abilty to problematise teaching;

  5. To understand practitioner research and engage in the intial stages of the research process;

  6. To develop competences for planning and giving lessons.




Learning outcomes and competences

By the end of IPP I, students will:



  1. be familiar with the primary school context;

  2. be aware of the competences needed to teach in this context;

  3. have initiated reflective practice and become aware of their ability to reflect;

  4. have developed their ability to critically observe;

  5. have developed their ability to problematise practice;

  6. have initiated an action research project;

  7. have a better understanding of theory in practice;

  8. have demonstrated their ability to plan lessons and other activities;

  9. have become aware of their ability to teach in this context.

Working method

Presencial

Program


  1. The primary school context;

  2. Reflection and reflective practice;

  3. The observation process;

  4. Action research in the primary classroom;

  5. Planning and teaching lessons;

  6. The teaching portfolio;

  7. The teaching practice report - content, organisation, contextualisation of the study.



Mandatory literature

Bell, J. ; Doing your Research Project: 4th Edition, Open University Press, 2005
Brown, J. D., & Coombe, C. (Eds.). ; The Cambridge Guide to Research in Language Teaching and Learning., CUP, 2015
Burns, A. ; Collaborative Action Research for English Language Teachers, CUP, 1999
Dornyei, Z. ; Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methodologies. , OUP, 2007
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. ; Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. , Routledge, 2016
Pinter A; Children Learning Languages, Palgrave, 2011
Richards, J. & Lockhart.(; Reflective teaching in Second Language Classrooms, CUP, 1996
Richards, J & Farrell. ; Professional Development for Language Teachers, CUP, 2005
Wallace, M.J. ; Action Research for Language Teachers. , CUP, 1998

Teaching methods and learning activities

The syllabus is realised in two contexts: seminars at FLUP and teaching practice in schools. These form part of a reciprocal relationship where students are guided through cycles of reflection for, in and on practice in seminars which prepares them for action in schools. Classroom observation sets the groundwork for conducting lesson activities and initiating investigative practices for action research which students prepare during this UC. The act of recording and discussing their observations in their reflective journals and portfolios helps students to develop analytical and critical reflection, and an awareness of the connection between theory and practice. This becomes more evident when they prepare for teaching and conduct lessons. Through teaching activities, these students will begin to understand the importance of planning and preparation, and of their own developing competences.


The methodology essentially incorporates a pedagogy of reflection where students are encouraged to ponder the principles of primary English language teaching from their new roles as observers, practitioners, and practitioner-researchers in this context. This necessitates a variety of modes (written, spoken), patterns (individual, with peers, with cooperating teachers and supervisors) and foci (e.g., classroom context, teachers, learners, self as teacher) for reflecting. Reflection is mainly guided through observation tasks set by faculty and school, in lesson planning and discussion of lessons observed and given.

 

Evaluation Type

Distributed evaluation without final exam

Assessment Components

Designation Weight (%)
Defesa pública de dissertação, de relatório de projeto ou estágio, ou de tese 40,00
Participação presencial 10,00
Trabalho de campo 30,00
Trabalho escrito 20,00
Total: 100,00

Amount of time allocated to each course unit

Designation Time (hours)
Elaboração de projeto 50,00
Elaboração de relatório/dissertação/tese 15,00
Estudo autónomo 52,00
Frequência das aulas 19,00
Realização de Estágio 26,00
Total: 162,00

Eligibility for exams

This UC incorporates the above syllabus in the following distribution of hours:

- Teaching practice: 26 hours = 1.5 hours / 13 weeks (10 hours of observed lessons + 3 hours of lessons (assessed) given by each student, one hour of which is observed by the supervisor from FLUP; 6.5 hours of pre-lesson discussion; 6.5 hours post-lesson feedback);

- Seminars at FLUP: 19.5 hours over 13 weeks;

- Tutorials at FLUP:13 hours;

- O: 2 hours

Calculation formula of final grade

Assessment: Continuous with no final exam:

Teaching practice – 30%

Teaching report (reflection on school context; on the observation process) – 40 %

Seminar component:

Teaching portfolio – 10%
Dialogue Journal (written) via Moodle – 10 %
Participation in FLUP seminars– 10%

Classification improvement

According to FLUP regulations

Observations

Teaching Practice April onwards:

Student-teachers will continue the observation process (synchronous and/or asynchronous lessons according to school circumstances) and school seminars with mentors via videoconferencing.

The three lessons which students will give will consist of full lesson plans and simulations of parts of these lessons for mentors and FLUP supervisors.  Lessons are assessed on planning, performance and critical reflection.
Recommend this page Top