Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Estimating home-range size: when to include a third dimension?
Publication

Publications

Estimating home-range size: when to include a third dimension?

Title
Estimating home-range size: when to include a third dimension?
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2013
Authors
Pedro Monterroso
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Neftali Sillero
(Author)
FCUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Luis Miguel Rosalino
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Filipa Loureiro
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Title: Ecology and EvolutionImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 3
Pages: 2285-2295
ISSN: 2045-7758
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell
Scientific classification
FOS: Natural sciences > Biological sciences
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-006-9FK
Abstract (EN): Most studies dealing with home ranges consider the study areas as if they were totally flat, working only in two dimensions, when in reality they are irregular surfaces displayed in three dimensions. By disregarding the third dimension (i.e., topography), the size of home ranges underestimates the surface actually occupied by the animal, potentially leading to misinterpretations of the animals' ecological needs. We explored the influence of considering the third dimension in the estimation of home-range size by modeling the variation between the planimetric and topographic estimates at several spatial scales. Our results revealed that planimetric approaches underestimate home-range size estimations, which range from nearly zero up to 22%. The difference between planimetric and topographic estimates of home-ranges sizes produced highly robust models using the average slope as the sole independent factor. Moreover, our models suggest that planimetric estimates in areas with an average slope of 16.3 degrees (+/- 0.4) or more will incur in errors >= 5%. Alternatively, the altitudinal range can be used as an indicator of the need to include topography in home-range estimates. Our results confirmed that home-range estimates could be significantly biased when topography is disregarded. We suggest that study areas where home-range studies will be performed should firstly be scoped for its altitudinal range, which can serve as an indicator for the need for posterior use of average slope values to model the surface area used and/or available for the studied animals.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Contact: pmonterroso@cibio.up.pt
No. of pages: 11
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Transcriptomic regulation of seasonal coat color change in hares (2020)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Mafalda S. Ferreira; Paulo C. Alves; Colin M. Callahan; Iwona Giska; Liliana Farelo; Hannes Jenny; L. Scott Mills; Klaus Hackländer; Jeffrey M. Good; José Melo-Ferreira
The genetics of adaptation in freshwater Eurasian shad (Alosa) (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Sabatino, SJ; Pereira, P; Carneiro, M; Dilyte, J; Archer, JP; Munoz, A; Nonnis-Marzano, F; santos, am
Glacial cycles drive rapid divergence of cryptic field vole species (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Fletcher, NK; Acevedo, P; Herman, JS; Paup?rio, J; Alves, PC; Searle, JB
Genetic structure of wildcat (Felis silvestris) populations in Italy (2013)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Mattucci, F; Oliveira, R; Bizzarri, L; Vercillo, F; Anile, S; Ragni, B; Lapini, L; Sforzi, A; Alves, PC; Lyons, LA; Randi, E

See all (8)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-26 at 00:38:49 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing