Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Paternity exclusion power: Comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding
Publication

Publications

Paternity exclusion power: Comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding

Title
Paternity exclusion power: Comparative behaviour of autosomal and X-chromosomal markers in standard and deficient cases with inbreeding
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2013
Authors
Nadia Pinto
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Leonor Gusmao
(Author)
Other
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Thore Egeland
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Antonio Amorim
(Author)
FCUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 7
Pages: 290-295
ISSN: 1872-4973
Publisher: Elsevier
Scientific classification
FOS: Medical and Health sciences > Other medical sciences
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-002-0PN
Abstract (EN): In paternity testing the informativeness of genetic markers is traditionally measured through the probability of finding, in randomly chosen individuals, inconsistencies with parent to child Mendelian rules of transmission. This statistic, called power of exclusion (PE), paternal exclusion chance or probability, can be defined for duos (mother not typed) or trios (random false fathers are matched against mother/child pairs) and performed both for autosomal and X-chromosomal markers (restricted to paternity testing involving daughters). PE is an a priori statistic, in the sense of not depending on the individual's genetic data of a case, being dependent however on the estimates of genetic markers allele (or haplotype) frequencies. We have studied the behaviour of this statistic in situations where the randomness assumption is not met, because either (a) the alleged - and false - father is related to the true one, or (b) there is a non-negligible level of background relatedness in the population. For the first case, we derived general (autosomal and X-chromosomal) PE formulas for duos and trios for any genealogy linking alleged father and child, highlighting that the PE of each marker only depends on a single kinship parameter associated with their pedigree. In this case we also estimate a lower bound for the number of extra markers needed to be analysed to achieve the same global power as for unrelated individuals. In the second situation, we demonstrate that for realistic values of the coancestry coefficient the decrease in PE due to population inbreeding is very moderate even when duos are analysed. In this work, beyond the aforementioned issues, we also discuss the suitability of assuming the pedigree father-daughter for calculating the X-PE, since X-markers are not the tool of choice in laboratorial routine when the alleged father is available for testing. Indeed, X-markers are particularly useful in situations where the alleged father is not available for testing but experts are able to type the mother or a daughter of his. Such increase of power is due to the paternal genealogies: half-and full-sisters, and grandmother-granddaughter, having a non-null X-PE even when only duos are analysed in contrast to what happens for autosomes. Algebraic expressions for these cases are also presented.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Contact: npinto@ipatimup.pt
No. of pages: 6
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

The risks of using "species-specific'' PCR assays in wildlife research: The case of red fox (Vulpes vulpes) identification in Tasmania (2014)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Joana Goncalves; Clive A Marks; David Obendorf; Antonio Amorim; Filipe Pereira
Reply to Sarre et al. "Defining specificity in DNA detection of wildlife" (2015)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Joana Goncalves; Clive A Marks; David Obendorf; Antonio Amorim; Filipe Pereira
Publication of population data for forensic purposes (2010)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Carracedo, A; Butler, JM; Gusmao, L; Parson, W; Roewer, L; Schneider, PM
Population database defined by 13 autosomal STR loci in a representative sample from Bahia, Northeast Brazil (2011)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Nascimento, E; Cerqueira, E; Gusmao, L
New guidelines for the publication of genetic population data (2013)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Carracedo, A; Butler, JM; Gusmao, L; Linacre, A; Parson, W; Roewer, L; Schneider, PM

See all (61)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-08 at 12:23:52 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing