Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement
Publication

Publications

Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement

Title
Information-based measure of disagreement for more than two observers: a useful tool to compare the degree of observer disagreement
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2013
Authors
Teresa Henriques
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Joao Bernardes
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Mara Matias
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Diogo Sato
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 13
Final page: 47
ISSN: 1471-2288
Publisher: Springer Nature
Scientific classification
FOS: Medical and Health sciences > Health sciences
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-005-2EW
Abstract (EN): Background: Assessment of disagreement among multiple measurements for the same subject by different observers remains an important problem in medicine. Several measures have been applied to assess observer agreement. However, problems arise when comparing the degree of observer agreement among different methods, populations or circumstances. Methods: The recently introduced information-based measure of disagreement (IBMD) is a useful tool for comparing the degree of observer disagreement. Since the proposed IBMD assesses disagreement between two observers only, we generalized this measure to include more than two observers. Results: Two examples (one with real data and the other with hypothetical data) were employed to illustrate the utility of the proposed measure in comparing the degree of disagreement. Conclusion: The IBMD allows comparison of the disagreement in non-negative ratio scales across different populations and the generalization presents a solution to evaluate data with different number of observers for different cases, an important issue in real situations. A website for online calculation of IBMD and respective 95% confidence interval was additionally developed. The website is widely available to mathematicians, epidemiologists and physicians to facilitate easy application of this statistical strategy to their own data.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Contact: teresasarhen@gmail.com
No. of pages: 6
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Protocol for a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of prognostic factors of foot ulceration in people with diabetes: the international research collaboration for the prediction of diabetic foot ulcerations (PODUS) (2013)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Crawford, F; Anandan, C; Chappell, FM; Murray, GD; Price, JF; Sheikh, A; Simpson, CR; Maxwell, M; Stansby, GP; Young, MJ; Abbott, CA; Boulton, AJ; Boyko, EJ; Kastenbauer, T; Leese, GP; Monami, M; Matilde Soares; Rith Najarian, SJ; Veves, A; Coates, N...(mais 4 authors)
Prognostic models for intracerebral hemorrhage: systematic review and meta-analysis (2018)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Gregorio, T; Pipa, S; Cavaleiro, P; Atanasio, G; Albuquerque, I; Castro-Chaves P; Azevedo L
Effect of questionnaire structure on recall of drug utilization in a population of university students (2009)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Gama, H; Correia, S; Lunet N
Development of a data classification system for preterm birth cohort studies: the RECAP Preterm project (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Bamber, D; Collins, HE; Powell, C; Goncalves, GC; Johnson, S; Manktelow, B; Ornelas, JP; João Correia Lopes; Rocha, A; Draper, ES
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-19 at 02:04:50 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing