The modified Misgav-Ladach versus the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique for cesarean section: a randomized trial

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2005

Authors

Xavier, P (Author) Other; Ayres De Campos, D (Author) FMUP; Reynolds, A (Author) Other; Guimaraes, M (Author) Other; Costa Santos, C (Author) FMUP; Patricio, B (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica

Vol. 84

Pages: 878-882

ISSN: 0001-6349

Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 33 Citations

Scopus - 39 Citations

Scientific classification

FOS: Medical and Health sciences > Clinical medicine

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-000-1DV

DOI: 10.1111/j.0001-6349.2005.00631.x

Abstract (EN): Background. Modifications to the classic cesarean section technique described by Pfannenstiel and Kerr have been proposed in the last few years. The objective of this trial was to compare intraoperative and short-term postoperative outcomes between the Pfannenstiel-Kerr and the modified Misgav-Ladach (MML) techniques for cesarean section. Methods. This prospective randomized trial involved 162 patients undergoing transverse lower uterine segment cesarean section. Patients were allocated to one of the two arms: 88 to the MML technique and 74 to the Pfannenstiel-Kerr technique. Main outcome measures were defined as the duration of surgery, analgesic requirements, and bowel restitution by the second postoperative day. Additional outcomes evaluated were febrile morbidity, postoperative antibiotic use, postpartum endometritis, and wound complications. Student's t, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used for statistical analysis of the results, and a p < 0.05 was considered as the probability level reflecting significant differences. Results. No differences between groups were noted in the incidence of analgesic requirements, bowel restitution by the second postoperative day, febrile morbidity, antibiotic requirements, endometritis, or wound complications. The MML technique took on average 12 min less to complete (p = 0.001). Conclusion. The MML technique is faster to perform and similar in terms of febrile morbidity, time to bowel restitution, or need for postoperative medications. It is likely to be more cost-effective.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 5