Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Self-reported data on reproductive variables were reliable among postmenopausal women
Publication

Publications

Self-reported data on reproductive variables were reliable among postmenopausal women

Title
Self-reported data on reproductive variables were reliable among postmenopausal women
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2008
Authors
Azevedo A
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Barros H
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 61 No. 9
Pages: 945-950
ISSN: 0895-4356
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-003-WK6
Abstract (EN): Objective: We aimed to assess the reliability of self-reported reproductive variables in postmenopausal women. Study Design and Setting: We evaluated 535 women in two interviews, as part of the recruitment and first follow-up of a cohort of Portuguese adults. Median time between evaluations was 5 years. Women were inquired about sociodemographic characteristics, cognitive status, and reproductive history: gravidity, parity, lifetime use of oral contraceptives, menopausal status, age at menopause, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and lifetime use of hormone replacement therapy (HRT). Results: Age at menopause was consistent within 1 year for 66% of women and agreement was higher in women reporting surgical menopause. Reliability regarding age at menopause decreased with time since menopause. Gravidity was consistent for 81% of women, whereas parity was consistent for 94%. The proportion of different answers regarding number of pregnancies and number of live births was higher in women with high gravidity and parity, respectively. Agreement was 96% for hysterectomy and 92% for oophorectomy. The proportion of consistent reports was 90% for oral contraceptives and 93% for HRT. Women with higher education reported parity and HRT more reliably. Conclusion: Agreement was over 90% for self-reported parity, hysterectomy, oophorectomy, and HRT, which supports their use in analytical studies.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 6
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

Sagittal Standing Posture, Back Pain, and Quality of Life Among Adults From the General Population A Sex-Specific Association (2014)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Araujo, F; Lucas, R; Alegrete, N; Azevedo A; Barros H
Individual and contextual characteristics as determinants of sagittal standing posture: a population-based study of adults (2014)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Araujo, F; Lucas, R; Alegrete, N; Azevedo A; Barros H

Of the same journal

Observer reliability and agreement: differences, difficulties, and controversies (2011)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Cristina Costa Santos; Joao Bemardes; Diogo Ayres de Campos
Epidemiologic practice and conduct guidelines: a new kid on the block (2018)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Barros H
Cumulative incidence estimates in the presence of competing risks (2018)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Morais, S; Antunes, L; Bento, MJ; Lunet N
The limits of agreement and the intraclass correlation coefficient may be inconsistent in the interpretation of agreement (2011)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Cristina Costa Santos; Joao Bernardes; Diogo Ayres de Campos; Antonia Costa; Celia Costa
Quantitative assessment of inconsistency in meta-analysis using decision thresholds with two new indices (2025)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Sousa-Pinto, B; Neumann, I; Vieira, RJ; Bognanni, A; Marques-Cruz, M; Gil-Mata, S; Mordue, S; Nevill, C; Baio, G; Whaley, P; Schwarzer, G; Steele, J; Stewart, G; Schünemann, HJ; Azevedo L

See all (10)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-18 at 04:25:43 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing