Abstract (EN):
Aim: The goal of this study was to evaluate nanoleakage within
the hybrid layer yielded by etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesive
systems, with different solvents and compositions.
Materials and methods: Four adhesives were applied onto 20
human dentin disks: group A: Adper Scotchbond 1XT™ (3M
ESPE), group B: One Coat Bond® (Coltène Whaledent), group C:
AdheSE® (Ivoclar Vivadent) and group D: Xeno-V® (Dentsply).
The samples were immersed in aqueous ammoniacal silver
nitrate for 24 hour, prepared and observed under field-emission
scanning electron microscopy with backscattered electrons.
Microphotographs were scanned and data were processed. The
mean value and standard deviation were calculated. Kruskal-
Wallis and Mann-Whitney tests were used (p < 0.05).
Results: All the adhesives showed nanoleakage within the
hybrid layer: Adper Scotchbond 1XT™ (218.5 μm ± 52.6 μm),
One Coat Bond® (139.6 μm ± 79.0 μm), AdheSE® (92.7 μm ±
64.8 μm) and Xeno-V® (251.0 μm ± 85.2 μm). AdheSE® yielded
less nanoleakage than Adper Scotchbond-1XT™ (p = 0.003)
and than Xeno-V® (p = 0.007). No other statistically significant
differences were detected.
Conclusion: Two-step self-etch adhesive system (AdheSE®)
might contribute for lower nanoleakage deposition and thus
better performance in dentin adhesion.
Clinical significance: The two-step self-etch adhesive system
showed the lowest nanoleakage deposition compared with the
other adhesive systems evaluated, which seems to indicate a
better behavior when a restoration is performed in dentin and
possibly can lead to a durable adhesion along time.
Keywords: Etch-and-rinse adhesives, Self-etch adhesives,
Hybrid layer, Nanoleakage.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific