QUAIDE - Quality assessment of AI preclinical studies in diagnostic endoscopy

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2025

Authors

Antonelli, G (Author) Other; Libanio, D (Author) Other; De Groof, AJ (Author) Other; van der Sommen, F (Author) Other; Mascagni, P (Author) Other; Sinonquel, P (Author) Other; Abdelrahim, M (Author) Other; Ahmad, O (Author) Other; Berzin, T (Author) Other; Bhandari, P (Author) Other; Bretthauer, M (Author) Other; Coimbra, M (Author) FCUP; Dekker, E (Author) Other; Ebigbo, A (Author) Other; Eelbode, T (Author) Other; Frazzoni, L (Author) Other; Gross, SA (Author) Other; Ishihara, R (Author) Other; Kaminski, MF (Author) Other; Messmann, H (Author) Other; Mori, Y (Author) Other; Padoy, N (Author) Other; Parasa, S (Author) Other; Pilonis, ND (Author) Other; Renna, F (Author) FCUP; Repici, A (Author) Other; Simsek, C (Author) Other; Spadaccini, M (Author) Other; Bisschops, R (Author) Other; Bergman, JJGHM (Author) Other; Hassan, C (Author) Other; Ribeiro, MD (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Gut

Vol. 74

Pages: 153-161

ISSN: 0017-5749

Publisher: BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 2 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-017-7MK

DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2024-332820

Abstract (EN): Artificial intelligence (AI) holds significant potential for enhancing quality of gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy, but the adoption of AI in clinical practice is hampered by the lack of rigorous standardisation and development methodology ensuring generalisability. The aim of the Quality Assessment of pre-clinical AI studies in Diagnostic Endoscopy (QUAIDE) Explanation and Checklist was to develop recommendations for standardised design and reporting of preclinical AI studies in GI endoscopy. The recommendations were developed based on a formal consensus approach with an international multidisciplinary panel of 32 experts among endoscopists and computer scientists. The Delphi methodology was employed to achieve consensus on statements, with a predetermined threshold of 80% agreement. A maximum three rounds of voting were permitted. Consensus was reached on 18 key recommendations, covering 6 key domains: data acquisition and annotation (6 statements), outcome reporting (3 statements), experimental setup and algorithm architecture (4 statements) and result presentation and interpretation (5 statements). QUAIDE provides recommendations on how to properly design (1. Methods, statements 1-14), present results (2. Results, statements 15-16) and integrate and interpret the obtained results (3. Discussion, statements 17-18). The QUAIDE framework offers practical guidance for authors, readers, editors and reviewers involved in AI preclinical studies in GI endoscopy, aiming at improving design and reporting, thereby promoting research standardisation and accelerating the translation of AI innovations into clinical practice.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 9