Central bank committee decision-making: a systematic literature review and research agenda

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2024

Authors

Léo, BB (Author) Other; Proença, Teresa (Author) FEP; Alves, Carlos (Author) FEP

Journal

Title: Journal of Banking Regulation

ISSN: 1745-6452

Publisher: Springer Nature

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-017-JZ3

DOI: 10.1057/s41261-024-00264-9

Abstract (EN): This paper systematically reviews the relevant research issues regarding central bank committee decision-making. The study builds on the seminal contribution of Stanek's (Comp Econ Res 16 1:103-121, 2013) decision-making framework, which offers a structured, comprehensive, and interdisciplinary approach to committee decision-making, enriching a line of research that previously focused on individual preferences, strategic interactions, and voting rules. It seeks to answer four research questions: 1. Which factors influence the decision-making of central bank committees? 2. What theoretical frameworks explain the decision-making of central bank committees? 3. What research methodologies are used in central bank committee decision-making studies? 4. What are the current research gaps related to central bank committee decision-making? Our findings indicate that both internal and external factors influence committee decision-making, with the impact varying according to each central bank's policy objectives and institutional arrangements. We also observe a growing trend towards employing more behavioral theoretical frameworks. Furthermore, the lack of access to central bank data, primarily due to transparency issues, presents a significant obstacle to research. We identify three major research gaps. This paper provides evidence on how external and internal factors can affect the strategies and outcomes of central bank committees, providing valuable insights for the formulation of appropriate monetary policy.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 20