Evaluating Visual Explainability in Chest X-Ray Pathology Detection

• Type: Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
• Date: 2024

Authors

Pereira, P (Author) Other; Rocha, J (Author) Other; Pedrosa, J (Author) Other; Ana Maria Mendonça (Author) FEUP

Conference proceedings International

Title: 2024 IEEE 22ND MEDITERRANEAN ELECTROTECHNICAL CONFERENCE, MELECON 2024

Pages: 1116-1121

IEEE 22nd Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON)

Porto, PORTUGAL, JUN 25-27, 2024

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations

Scopus - 0 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-016-W3R

DOI: 10.1109/melecon56669.2024.10608569

Abstract (EN): Chest X-Ray (CXR), plays a vital role in diagnosing lung and heart conditions, but the high demand for CXR examinations poses challenges for radiologists. Automatic support systems can ease this burden by assisting radiologists in the image analysis process. While Deep Learning models have shown promise in this task, concerns persist regarding their complexity and decision-making opacity. To address this, various visual explanation techniques have been developed to elucidate the model reasoning, some of which have received significant attention in literature and are widely used such as GradCAM. However, it is unclear how different explanations methods perform and how to quantitatively measure their performance, as well as how that performance may be dependent on the model architecture used and the dataset characteristics. In this work, two widely used deep classification networks - DenseNet121 and ResNet50 - are trained for multi-pathology classification on CXR and visual explanations are then generated using GradCAM, GradCAM++, EigenGrad-CAM, Saliency maps, LRP and DeepLift. These explanations methods are then compared with radiologist annotations using previously proposed explainability evaluations metrics - intersection over union and hit rate. Furthermore, a novel method to convey visual explanations in the form of radiological written reports is proposed, allowing for a clinically-oriented explainability evaluation metric - zones score. It is shown that Grad-CAM++ and Saliency methods offer the most accurate explanations and that the effectiveness of visual explanations is found to vary based on the model and corresponding input size. Additionally, the explainability performance across different CXR datasets is evaluated, highlighting that the explanation quality depends on the dataset's characteristics and annotations.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 6