Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Navigating Neurotoxicity and Safety Assessment of Nanocarriers for Brain Delivery: Strategies and Insights
Publication

Publications

Navigating Neurotoxicity and Safety Assessment of Nanocarriers for Brain Delivery: Strategies and Insights

Title
Navigating Neurotoxicity and Safety Assessment of Nanocarriers for Brain Delivery: Strategies and Insights
Type
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Year
2024
Authors
Teixeira, MI
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Lopes, CM
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Maria Helena Amaral
(Author)
FFUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Paulo Costa
(Author)
FFUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Title: Acta BiomaterialiaImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 189
Pages: 25-56
ISSN: 1742-7061
Publisher: Elsevier
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations
Publicação em Scopus Scopus - 0 Citations
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-017-7BG
Abstract (EN): Nanomedicine, an area that uses nanomaterials for theragnostic purposes, is advancing rapidly, particularly in the detection and treatment of neurodegenerative diseases. The design of nanocarriers can be optimized to enhance drug bioavailability and targeting to specific organs, improving therapeutic outcomes. However, clinical translation hinges on biocompatibility and safety. Nanocarriers can cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), potentially causing neurotoxic effects through mechanisms such as oxidative stress, DNA damage, and neuroinflammation. Concerns about their accumulation and persistence in the brain make it imperative to carry out a nanotoxicological risk assessment. Generally, this involves identifying exposure sources and routes, characterizing physicochemical properties, and conducting cytotoxicity assays both in vitro and in vivo . The lack of a specialized regulatory framework creates substantial gaps, making it challenging to translate findings across development stages. Additionally, there is a pressing need for innovative testing methods due to constraints on animal use and the demand for high-throughput screening. This review examines the mechanisms of nanocarrier-induced neurotoxicity and the challenges in risk assessment, highlighting the impact of physicochemical properties and the advantages and limitations of current neurotoxicity evaluation models. Future perspectives are also discussed. Additional guidance is crucial to improve the safety of nanomaterials and reduce associated uncertainty. Statement of significance Nanocarriers show tremendous potential for theragnostic purposes in neurological diseases, enhancing drug targeting to the brain, and improving biodistribution and pharmacokinetics. However, their neurotoxicity is still a major field to be explored, with only 5% of nanotechnology-related publications addressing this matter. This review focuses on the issue of neurotoxicity and safety assessment of nanocarriers for brain delivery. Neurotoxicity-relevant exposure sources, routes, and molecular mechanisms, along with the impact of the physicochemical properties of nanomaterials, are comprehensively described. Moreover, the different experimental models used for neurotoxicity evaluation are explored at length, including their main advantages and limitations. To conclude, we discuss current challenges and future perspectives for a better understanding of risk assessment of nanocarriers for neurobiomedical applications. (c) 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Acta Materialia Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 32
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

Riluzole-loaded lipid nanoparticles for brain delivery: Preparation, optimization and characterization (2023)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Teixeira, MI; Lopes, CM; Gonsalves, H; Catita, J; Silva, AM; Rodrigues, F; Maria Helena Amaral; Paulo Costa

Of the same journal

Trends and considerations in annulus fibrosus in vitro model design (2025)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Castro, AL; Gonçalves, RM
The inflammasome in host response to biomaterials: Bridging inflammation and tissue regeneration (2019)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Vasconcelos, DP; AP Águas; Barbosa, MA; Pelegrin, P; Judite N Barbosa
Injectable alginate hydrogels for cell delivery in tissue engineering (2014)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Silvia J Bidarra; Cristina C Barrias; Pedro L Granja
Functionalization of biomaterials with small osteoinductive moieties (2013)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Raquel Maia, FR; Silvia J Bidarra; Pedro L Granja; Cristina C Barrias
3D chitosan scaffolds impair NLRP3 inflammasome response in macrophages (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Vasconcelos, DP; de Torre Minguela, C; Gomez, AI; AP Águas; Barbosa, MA; Pelegrin, P; Judite N Barbosa

See all (57)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-17 at 07:13:41 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing