Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > The impact of teleworking in psychologists during COVID-19: Burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress
Publication

Publications

The impact of teleworking in psychologists during COVID-19: Burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress

Title
The impact of teleworking in psychologists during COVID-19: Burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2022
Authors
Serrao, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Rodrigues, AR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
teixeira, a
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Castro, L
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Ivone Duarte
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 10
Publisher: Frontiers Media
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00X-BQB
Resumo (PT):
Abstract (EN): BackgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic has forced mental health professionals to adapt quickly. The pandemic has created multiple new tasks for the psychologist. In addition to the various stressors closely linked to the COVID-19 pandemic, psychologists were forced to make their services more flexible. Teleworking was a way of continuing to work. ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the impact of working pattern on the levels of burnout, depression, anxiety, and stress. MethodsThis was a cross-sectional study based on an online questionnaire applied to eighty-three Portuguese psychologists. Data were collected from May 9 to June 8, 2020, a period comprising the declaration of a national calamity and then state of emergency, and the subsequent ease of lockdown measures. The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Scale and Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale were used. Univariate multiple linear regression models were estimated for each mental health outcome. ResultsSignificant differences were found between psychologists working in the workplace and in teleworking at the personal burnout, work-related burnout, client-related burnout, depression, and stress. In multiple linear regression, teleworking, not working, and being unmarried was significantly associated with higher levels of depression. Teleworking was significantly associated with higher stress scores and client-related and work burnout. ConclusionsThis exceptional time of sudden, mandatory, and high-intensity teleworking, required rapid adaptation, giving rise to new stressors that might have been responsible for burnout levels in psychologists.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 9
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

The Writing's on the Wall: On Health Inequalities, Migrants, and Coronavirus (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Shaaban, AN; peleteiro, b; Martins, MRO
Special Report: The Biology of Inequalities in Health: The Lifepath Consortium (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Vineis, P; Avendano Pabon, M; Barros H; Bartley, M; Carmeli, C; Carra, L; Chadeau Hyam, M; Costa, G; Delpierre, C; D'Errico, A; Sílvia Fraga; Giles, G; Goldberg, M; Kelly Irving, M; Kivimaki, M; Lepage, B; Lang, T; Layte, R; MacGuire, F; Mackenbach, JP...(mais 11 authors)
Seroprevalence of Hepatitis B virus surface antigen among African blood donors: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Quintas, AE; Cuboia, N; Cordeiro, L; Sarmento A; Azevedo L
“Are we still at this point?:” persistent misconceptions about the adequacy, rigor and quality of qualitative health research (2025)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Ana Moura; Sílvia Fraga; Pedro D. Ferreira; Mariana Amorim
Validation of the Portuguese Version of the Risk Instrument for Screening in the Community (RISC) Among Older Patients in Primary Care in Northern Portugal (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Santos, S; O'Caoimh, R; Teixeira, L; Alves, S; Molloy, W; Constança Paúl

See all (35)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-06 at 20:16:52 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing