Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Feed-in tariff contract schemes and regulatory uncertainty
Publication

Publications

Feed-in tariff contract schemes and regulatory uncertainty

Title
Feed-in tariff contract schemes and regulatory uncertainty
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Barbosa, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Nunes, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Sardinha, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 287
Pages: 331-347
ISSN: 0377-2217
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00S-8MY
Abstract (EN): This paper presents a novel analysis of two feed-in tariffs (FIT) under market and regulatory uncertainty, namely a sliding premium with cap and floor and a minimum price guarantee. Regulatory uncertainty is modeled with a Poisson process, whereby a jump event may reduce the tariff before the signature of the contract. Using a semi-analytical real options framework, we derive the project value, the optimal investment threshold, and the value of the investment opportunity for these schemes. Taking into consideration the optimal investment threshold, we also compare the two aforementioned FITs with the fixed-price FIT and the fixed-premium FIT, which are policy schemes that have been extensively studied in the literature. Our results show that increasing the likelihood of a jump event lowers the investment threshold for all the schemes; moreover, the investment threshold also decreases when the tariff reduction increases. We also compare the four schemes in terms of the corresponding optimal investment thresholds. For example, we find that the investment threshold of the sliding premium is lower than the minimum price guarantee. This result suggests that the first regime is a better policy than the latter because it accelerates the investment while avoiding excessive earnings for producers or excessive payments for consumers.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 17
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Synchronisation in vehicle routing: Classification schema, modelling framework and literature review (2024)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Soares, R; Marques, A; Pedro Amorim; Parragh, SN
Retail shelf space planning problems: A comprehensive review and classification framework (2021)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Teresa Bianchi Aguiar ; Alexander Hübner; Maria Antónia Carravilla; José Fernando Oliveira
Irregular packing problems: A review of mathematical models (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Aline A. S. Leão; Franklina M. B. Toledo; José Fernando Oliveira; Maria Antónia Carravilla; Ramón Alvarez-Valdés
Digitalization and omnichannel retailing: Innovative OR approaches for retail operations (2021)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Alexander Hübner; Pedro Amorim; Jan Fransoo; Dorothee Honhon; Heinrich Kuhn; Victor Martinez de Albeniz; David Robb
Cutting and packing (2007)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Jose Fernando Oliveira; Rua Dr. Roberto Frias; Gerhard Wascher

See all (94)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-08 at 01:14:39 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing