Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Industries, citizens, and non-governmental organizations' positioning and arguments used in European Union initiatives for alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation
Publication

Publications

Industries, citizens, and non-governmental organizations' positioning and arguments used in European Union initiatives for alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation

Title
Industries, citizens, and non-governmental organizations' positioning and arguments used in European Union initiatives for alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2024
Authors
Baumann, S
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 129
ISSN: 0955-3959
Publisher: Elsevier
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations
Publicação em Scopus Scopus - 0 Citations
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-010-Z1N
Abstract (EN): Background: The European region has the highest daily alcohol consumption per capita and a high alcohol-related burden of disease. Policymaking at the European Union level is open to participation by interest groups, from public health organizations to alcohol industry representatives. This study aimed to map the interest groups present in the alcohol taxation and cross-border regulation initiatives and identify which arguments were used to support positions in favor or against them. Methods: We used qualitative content analysis on the comments submitted on the official European Commission website during the 2017, 2018, 2020, and 2022 participation periods. Interest groups were characterized considering their positioning, and arguments were identified and compared by position and type of initiative. Results: Opponents of changes to the structures of alcohol excise duties and cross-border regulations were mostly representatives of the alcohol and agricultural industries, and the proponents were mostly health-related nongovernmental organizations. Opponents of these initiatives used a wide variety of arguments, from economic and trade to health arguments, while proponents focused mainly on health arguments, such as the effectiveness of alcohol taxation in preventing alcohol-related morbidity and mortality. Conclusion: This study highlights the wide range of arguments used by opponents around alcohol control policies, contrasting with the health-centered arguments of proponents. It further shows that there is a lobbying network at the European Union level, combining national and international representatives of industry and nongovernmental organizations. These findings provide an opportunity for better preparation for upcoming discussions on alcohol control at national and regional levels.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 11
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Syringe exchange in community pharmacies-The Portuguese experience (2010)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Torre, C; Lucas, R; Barros H
Syringe exchange in community pharmacies - The Portuguese experinece Drug Policy (2010)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Torre C; Lucas R; Barros H
Personalising the evaluation of substance misuse treatment: a new approach to outcome measurement (2015)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Paula C. G. Alves; Célia Sales; Mark Ashworth
Evaluation of a drug checking service at a large scale electronic music festival in Portugal (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Helena Valente; Daniel Martins; Helena Carvalho; Cristiana Vale Pires; Maria Carmo Carvalho; Marta Pinto; Monica J. Barratt
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-13 at 20:50:40 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing