Awake Craniotomy Program Implementation

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2024

Authors

Moniz-Garcia, D (Author) Other; Bojaxhi, E (Author) Other; Borah, BJ (Author) Other; Dholakia, R (Author) Other; Kim, H (Author) Other; Sousa-Pinto, B (Author) FMUP; Almeida, JP (Author) Other; Mendhi, M (Author) Other; Freeman, WD (Author) Other; Sherman, W (Author) Other; Christel, L (Author) Other; Rosenfeld, S (Author) Other; Grewal, SS (Author) Other; Middlebrooks, EH (Author) Other; Sabsevitz, D (Author) Other; Gruenbaum, BF (Author) Other; Chaichana, KL (Author) Other; Quiñones-Hinojosa, A (Author) Other

Journal

Title: JAMA Network Open

ISSN: 2574-3805

Publisher: American Medical Association

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00Z-WH0

DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.52917

Abstract (EN): <jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-4"><jats:title>Importance</jats:title><jats:p>Implementing multidisciplinary teams for treatment of complex brain tumors needing awake craniotomies is associated with significant costs. To date, there is a paucity of analysis on the cost utility of introducing advanced multidisciplinary standardized teams to enable awake craniotomies.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-5"><jats:title>Objective</jats:title><jats:p>To assess the cost utility of introducing a standardized program of awake craniotomies.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-6"><jats:title>Design, Setting, and Participants</jats:title><jats:p>A retrospective economic evaluation was conducted at Mayo Clinic Florida. All patients with single, unilateral lesions who underwent elective awake craniotomies between January 2016 and December 2021 were considered eligible for inclusion. The economic perspective of the health care institution and a time horizon of 1 year were considered. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to May 2023.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-7"><jats:title>Exposure</jats:title><jats:p>Treatment with an awake craniotomy before standardization (2016-2018) compared with treatment with awake craniotomy after standardization (2018-2021).</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-8"><jats:title>Main Outcomes and Measures</jats:title><jats:p>Patient demographics, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes, including length of stay, intensive care (ICU) admission, extent of resection, readmission rates, and 1-year mortality were compared between patients undergoing surgery before and after standardization. Direct medical costs were estimated from Medicare reimbursement rates for all billed procedures. A cost-utility analysis was performed considering differences in direct medical costs and in 1-year mortality within the periods before and after standardization of procedures. Uncertainty was explored in probability sensitivity analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-9"><jats:title>Results</jats:title><jats:p>A total of 164 patients (mean [SD] age, 49.9 [15.7] years; 98 [60%] male patients) were included in the study. Of those, 56 underwent surgery before and 108 after implementation of procedure standardization. Procedure standardization was associated with reductions in length of stay from a mean (SD) of 3.34 (1.79) to 2.46 (1.61) days (difference, 0.88 days; 95% CI, 0.33-1.42 days; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic>¿=¿.002), length of stay in ICU from a mean (SD) of 1.32 (0.69) to 0.99 (0.90) nights (difference, 0.33 nights; 95% CI, 0.06-0.60 nights; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic>¿=¿.02), 30-day readmission rate from 14% (8 patients) in the prestandardization cohort to 5% (5 patients) (difference, 9%; 95% CI, 19.6%-0.3%; <jats:italic>P</jats:italic>¿=¿.03), while extent of resection and intraoperative complication rates were similar between both cohorts. The standardized protocol was associated with mean (SD) savings of $7088.80 ($12¿389.50) and decreases in 1-year mortality (dominant intervention). This protocol was found to be cost saving in 75.5% of all simulations in probability sensitivity analysis.</jats:p></jats:sec><jats:sec id="ab-zoi231554-10"><jats:title>Conclusions and Relevance</jats:title><jats:p>In this economic evaluation of standardization of awake craniotomy, there was a generalized reduction in length of stay, ICU admission time, and direct medical costs with implementation of an optimized protocol. This was achieved without compromising patient outcomes and with similar ext

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific