Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Gender and Risk Aversion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Publication

Publications

Gender and Risk Aversion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Title
Gender and Risk Aversion: Evidence from a Natural Experiment
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2023
Authors
Pacheco, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Lobao, J
(Author)
FEP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Coelho, S
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Title: GamesImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 14
Final page: 49
ISSN: 2073-4336
Publisher: MDPI
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Science ISI Web of Science
ProQuest
Econlit
DOAJ
EBSCO
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00Y-HJE
Abstract (EN): The theoretical literature on risk aversion and Expected Utility Theory is extensive; however, the analysis of this behaviour with natural experiments could be more comprehensive. In this paper, we use data from 120 episodes of the Portuguese version of the TV game show The Price is Right, namely from The Wheel game, to explore risk aversion as well as the impact of gender in decision-making. The Wheel game has straightforward rules and huge expected payoffs. All contestants have access to the same information and distributions of uncertainty, making it a unique field laboratory to conduct an experimental test of rational decision theory. The objective is to infer the risk aversion levels of decision-makers from their choice to turn the wheel and the influence of gender on risk attitudes. There is a widespread view that women are more risk-averse than men. However, we could not reject the hypothesis that women and men have the same level of risk aversion. Nevertheless, we have evidence that contestants are more risk-averse than risk-seeking. The omission bias, loss aversion and regret can explain that behaviour.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 16
Documents
File name Description Size
games-14-00049 Artigo 337.14 KB
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Multidimensional screening with complementary activities: regulating a monopolist with unknown cost and unknown preference for empire-building (2013)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Ana P. Borges; Didier Laussel; João Correia-da-Silva
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-21 at 11:48:36 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing