An ecotoxicological approach can complement the assessment of natural waters from Portuguese reservoirs?

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2022

Authors

Rodrigues, S (Author) Other; Isabel Sousa Pinto (Author) FCUP; Martins, F (Author) Other; Formigo, N (Author) FCUP; Antunes, SC (Author) FCUP

Journal

Title: Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Vol. 29

ISSN: 0944-1344

Publisher: Springer Nature

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 4 Citations

Scopus - 5 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00W-9FX

DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-19504-4

Abstract (EN): Within the scope of the European Water Framework Directive (WFD), the scientific community recognized clear opportunities to take advantage of the use of ecotoxicological tools in water quality assessments. In this perspective, bioassays and biomarkers were suggested to contribute to the integration of the chemical and biological conditions, and thus to provide an overall insight into the quality of a water body. This study aimed to assess whether current bioassays as feeding rate assays with Daphnia longispina and growth inhibition assays with Lemna minor are suitable to detect potential ecotoxicity, using waters from Portuguese reservoirs. Several sampling sites were defined in reservoirs (Miranda, Pocinho, and Alqueva). The samplings were conducted in autumn of 2018 and spring of 2019. Total chlorophyll, lipid peroxidation, and proline content were also evaluated in L. minor. Results demonstrated that D. longispina showed some sensitivity to water treatments; however, the results were difficult to interpret since no reason or trend can be accurate. All parameters of L. minor did not show sensitivity to detect potential ecotoxicological risks associated with natural water understudy, since no discrimination among the water treatments was recorded. However, biomarkers/bioassays proved to be concordant to each other. Under the conditions evaluated here (reservoirs and sampling periods), the biological responses observed were not consistent, clear, and coherent with the physical-chemical parameters and chemical analyses performed, suggesting that the ecotoxicological tools selected were not sensitive to assess water quality in this type of ecosystems. In this sense, species of different trophic levels are recommended for ecotoxicological analyses due to differences in species sensitivities.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 15