Surveillance and management of urologic complications after spinal cord injury

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2018

Authors

Kreydin, E (Author) Other; Welk, B (Author) Other; Chung, D (Author) Other; Clemens, Q (Author) Other; Yang, C (Author) Other; Danforth, T (Author) Other; Gousse, A (Author) Other; Kielb, S (Author) Other; Kraus, S (Author) Other; Mangera, A (Author) Other; Reid, S (Author) Other; Szell, N (Author) Other; Francisco Cruz (Author) FMUP; Chartier Kastler, E (Author) Other; Ginsberg, DA (Author) Other

Journal

Title: World Journal of Urology

Vol. 36

Pages: 1545-1553

ISSN: 0724-4983

Publisher: Springer Nature

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 34 Citations

Scopus - 40 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00P-NBD

DOI: 10.1007/s00345-018-2345-0

Abstract (EN): PurposeNeurogenic bladder due to spinal cord injury has significant consequences for patients' health and quality of life. Regular surveillance is required to assess the status of the upper and lower urinary lower urinary tracts and prevent their deterioration. In this review, we examine surveillance techniques in neurogenic bladder, describe common complications of this disease, and address strategies for their management.MethodsThis work represents the efforts of SIU-ICUD joint consultation on Urologic Management of the Spinal Cord injury. For this specific topic, a workgroup was formed and comprehensive literature search of English language manuscripts regarding neurogenic bladder management was performed using key words of neurogenic bladder. Articles were compiled, and recommendations in the chapter are based on group discussion and follow the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine system for Levels of Evidence (LOEs) and Grades of Recommendation (GORs).ResultsAt a minimum, patients should undergo an annual history and physical examination, renal functional testing (e.g., serum creatinine), and upper tract imaging (e.g., renal ultrasonography). The existing evidence does not support the use of other modalities, such as cystoscopy or urodynamics, for routine surveillance. Urologic complications in neurogenic bladder patients are common and often more complex than in the general population.ConclusionsThere is a shortage of high-quality evidence to support any particular neurogenic bladder surveillance protocol. However, there is consensus regarding certain aspects of regular genitourinary system evaluation in these patients. Proper surveillance allows the clinician to avoid or address common urological complications, and to guide, alter, or maintain appropriate therapeutic regimens for individual patients.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 9