Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Classification of Defect Types in Requirements Specifications: Literature Review, Proposal and Assessment
Publication

Publications

Classification of Defect Types in Requirements Specifications: Literature Review, Proposal and Assessment

Title
Classification of Defect Types in Requirements Specifications: Literature Review, Proposal and Assessment
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2011
Authors
margarido, il
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
vidal, rm
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
vieira, m
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 555-560
6th Iberian Information Systems and Technologies Conference
Chaves, PORTUGAL, JUN 15-18, 2011
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Proceedings ISI Proceedings
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations
Scientific classification
FOS: Natural sciences > Computer and information sciences
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-002-WCZ
Abstract (EN): Requirements defects have a major impact throughout the whole software lifecycle. Having a specific defects classification for requirements is important to analyse the root causes of problems, build checklists that support requirements reviews and to reduce risks associated with requirements problems. In our research we analyse several defects classifiers; select the ones applicable to requirements specifications, following rules to build defects taxonomies; and assess the classification validity in an experiment of requirements defects classification performed by graduate and undergraduate students. Not all subjects used the same type of defect to classify the same defect, which suggests that defects classification is not consensual. Considering our results we give recommendations to industry and other researchers on the design of classification schemes and treatment of classification results.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
Contact: isabel.margarido@fe.up.pt; jpfaria@fe.up.pt; rmvidal@fe.up.pt; mvieira@dei.uc.p
No. of pages: 6
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-05 at 20:09:26 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing