Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch
Publication

Publications

Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch

Title
Intradermal Tests for Diagnosis of Drug Allergy are not Affected by a Topical Anesthetic Patch
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2014
Authors
Couto, M
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Silva, D
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Ferreira, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Cernadas, JR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 6
Pages: 458-462
ISSN: 2092-7355
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-009-TH5
Abstract (EN): The use of topical anesthesia to perform intradermal tests (IDTs) for drug allergy diagnosis was never investigated. We aimed to determine the effects of a topical anesthetic patch containing prilocaine-lidocaine on wheal size of IDT with drugs. Patients who had positive IDT as part of their investigation process of suspected drug hypersensitivity were selected. IDT were performed according to guidelines. Anesthetic patch (AP) was placed and the same prior positive IDT, as well as positive histamine skin prick test (SPT) and negative (saline IDT) controls, were performed in the anesthetized area. Patients with negative IDT were also included to check for false positives with AP. Increase in wheals after 20 minutes both with and without AP was recorded and compared. 45 IDT were performed (36 patients), of which 37 have been previously positive (14 antibiotics, 10 general anesthetics, 6 non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, 3 iodinated contrasts, 3 anti-Hi-histamines and 1 ranitidine). Mean histamine SPT size without the AP was 4.7 mm [95%CI (4.4-5.1)], and 4.6 mm [95%CI (4.2-5.0)] with anesthesia. Mean wheal increase in IDT for drugs without the anesthesia was 4.5 mm [95%CI (3.3-5.7)] and with anesthesia was 4.3 mm [95%CI (2.8-5.8)]. No statistical significant differences were observed between skin tests with or without AP for histamine SPT (P=0.089), IDT with saline (P=0.750), and IDT with drugs (P=0.995). None of the patients with negative IDT showed positivity with the AP, or vice-versa. The use of an AP containing prilocaine-lidocaine does not interfere with IDT to diagnose drug allergy, and no false positive tests were found.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 5
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Aligning the Good Practice MASK With the Objectives of the European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Bousquet, J; Farrell, J; Illario, M; Onorato, GL; Bedbrook, A; Czarlewski, W; Micheli, Y; Arnavielhe, S; Ansotegui, IJ; Anto, JM; Bachert, C; Basagana, X; Bedard, A; Benveniste, S; Bergmann, KC; Bewick, M; Bindslev Jensen, C; Bjermer, L; Blain, H; Bosnic Anticevich, S...(mais 102 authors)
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-15 at 19:26:12 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing