The Portuguese version of the RhinoQOL Questionnaire: validation and clinical application

• Type: Article in International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2015

Authors

Cerejeira, R (Author) Other; Veloso Teles, R (Author) Other; Lousan, N (Author) Other; Carla Pinto Moura (Author) FMUP

Journal

Title: Brazilian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology

Vol. 81

Pages: 630-635

ISSN: 1808-8694

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 6 Citations

Scopus - 5 Citations

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00G-X4F

DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2015.08.015

Abstract (EN): Introduction: Rhinosinusitis constitutes an important health problem, with significant interference in personal, professional, and social functioning. This study presents the validation process of the Portuguese version of the RhinoQOL, to be used as a routine procedure in the assessment of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis. Objective: To demonstrate that the Portuguese version of the RhinoQOL is as valid as the English version to measure symptoms and health-related quality of life in chronic rhinosinusitis. Methods: The Portuguese version of the RhinoQOL was administered consecutively to 58 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps, assessed for endoscopic sinus surgery. A follow-up survey was completed three months after surgery. Statistical analysis was performed to determine its psychometric properties. Results: Face and content validity were confirmed by similar internal consistency as the original questionnaire for each sub-scale, and strong correlation between individual items and total score. The questionnaire was easy and quick to administer (5.5 min). At three months, there was a significant decrease from baseline for all sub-scale scores, indicating clinical improvement, with an effect size considered as large. Conclusion: This study provides a questionnaire that is equivalent to the original English version, with good responsiveness to change, which can be especially valuable to measure the outcome of surgery.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 6