Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline
Publication

Publications

Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline

Title
Endoscopic surveillance after surgical or endoscopic resection for colorectal cancer: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and European Society of Digestive Oncology (ESDO) Guideline
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2019
Authors
Hassan, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Wysocki, PT
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Fuccio, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Seufferlein, T
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Brandao, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Regula, J
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Frazzoni, L
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Pellise, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Alfieri, S
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Dekker, E
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Jover, R
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Rosati, G
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Senore, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Spada, C
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Gralnek, I
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Dumonceau, JM
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
van Hooft, JE
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
van Cutsem, E
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Ponchon, T
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Journal
Title: EndoscopyImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 51
Pages: 266-277
ISSN: 0013-726X
Publisher: Thieme
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00Q-9NC
Abstract (EN): MAIN RECOMMENDATIONS 1 We recommend post-surgery endoscopic surveillance for CRC patients after intent-to-cure surgery and appropriate oncological treatment for both local and distant disease. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 2 We recommend a high quality perioperative colonoscopy before surgery for CRC or within 6 months following surgery. Strong recommendation, low quality evidence. 3 We recommend performing surveillance colonoscopy 1 year after CRC surgery. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 4 We do not recommend an intensive endoscopic surveillance strategy, e.g. annual colonoscopy, because of a lack of proven benefit. Strong recommendation, moderate quality evidence. 5 After the first surveillance colonoscopy following CRC surgery, we suggest the second colonoscopy should be performed 3 years later, and the third 5 years after the second. If additional high risk neoplastic lesions are detected, subsequent surveillance examinations at shorter intervals may be considered. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 6 After the initial surveillance colonoscopy, we suggest halting post-surgery endoscopic surveillance at the age of 80 years, or earlier if life-expectancy is thought to be limited by comorbidities. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence. 7 In patients with a low risk pT1 CRC treated by endoscopy with an R0 resection, we suggest the same endoscopic surveillance schedule as for any CRC. Weak recommendation, low quality evidence.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 12
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

White flat lesions in the gastric corpus may be intestinal metaplasia (2017)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Dobru, D; Libanio, D; Mario Dinis Ribeiro
Use of mechanical lithotripter to assist in the endoscopic removal of an impacted long chicken bone in sigmoid diverticula (2023)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Rodrigues Pinto, E; Dias, E; Medas, R; Macedo G
Two-step two-stent technique to manage a large gastrocolonic fistula (2017)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Libanio, D; Lage, J; Pires, S; Silva, R; Mario Dinis Ribeiro
Transient gastric ischemia as a complication of cystotomy in endoscopic pancreatic pseudocyst drainage (2015)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
João Santos-Antunes; Moutinho Ribeiro, P; Macedo G
Traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for a gastric lesion involving the pyloric ring and duodenal bulb (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Rodriguez Carrasco, M; Nunes, G; Libanio, D; Pedro Pimentel-Nunes; Mario Dinis Ribeiro

See all (117)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-13 at 08:05:24 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing