Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN AND COVID-19: PRIVACY VERSUS PUBLIC INTEREST
Publication

Publications

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN AND COVID-19: PRIVACY VERSUS PUBLIC INTEREST

Title
THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN AND COVID-19: PRIVACY VERSUS PUBLIC INTEREST
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2021
Authors
Correia, M
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Guilhermina Rego
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Rui Nunes
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Title: Acta BioethicaImported from Authenticus Search for Journal Publications
Vol. 27
Pages: 59-67
ISSN: 0717-5906
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00V-4EA
Abstract (EN): Recent studies highlight the importance of digital surveillance to gather individual health information due to the global pandemic caused by the new COVID-19 disease. This paper analyses its legal and ethical implications at the interface between the individual right to privacy and the collective interests of public health. We framed the discussion in law, deontology and utilitarianism. The lasted theories and human rights, especially privacy, are crucial in our argument. Health-derived dilemmas and efforts to solve them, especially by information technologies, bioethics and law, exist at these perspectives' interface. In particular, we analysed the intersection between autonomy, the right to privacy, and the so-called 'right to be forgotten' in the public health context. In other words, we studied the right to obtain from the controller the erasure of health data - a radical means of control over personal data established in Article 17 of the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). Given the lack of specifics regarding collection and re-use of such data under the broad scope of public health purposes, implied consent does not address the issue of proportionality. We highlight legal safeguards' insufficiency, suggesting applying the `right to be forgotten' according to an ethical interpretation.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 9
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same authors

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN VERSUS THE RIGHT TO DISCLOSURE OF GAMETE DONORS' ID: ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Correia, M; Guilhermina Rego; Rui Nunes
Gender Transition: Is There a Right to Be Forgotten? (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Correia, M; Guilhermina Rego; Rui Nunes

Of the same journal

THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN VERSUS THE RIGHT TO DISCLOSURE OF GAMETE DONORS' ID: ETHICAL AND LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Correia, M; Guilhermina Rego; Rui Nunes
THE RIGHT TO BE FORGOTTEN REGARDING GENETIC DATA: A LEGAL AND ETHICAL ANALYSIS (2024)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Correia, M; Guilhermina Rego; Nunes, R
THE APPLICATION OF BIOETHICS AS LEGAL BASIS IN JUDICIAL SENTENCES CONCERNING RIGHT TO HEALTH IN BRAZIL (2024)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Mariot E.A.S.; Barbas S.; Nunes R.
TEACHING OF ETHICS IN MEDICAL UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAMS (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Tavares, ACALD; Travassos, AGA; Tavares, RD; Rego, MFMPD; Rui Nunes

See all (18)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-12 at 15:35:15 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing