Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Publication

Publications

Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Title
Risk factors for bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Type
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Year
2016
Authors
Costa, MN
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Pedro Pimentel-Nunes
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Journal
Vol. 84
Pages: 572-586
ISSN: 0016-5107
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00M-A8F
Abstract (EN): Background and Aims: Postprocedural bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event associated with endoscopic resection. Several studies have tried to identify risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), with controversial results. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify significant risk factors for PPB after gastric EMR and ESD. Methods: Three online databases were searched. Pooled odds ratio (OR) was computed for each risk factor using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed by Cochran's Q test and I-2. Results: Seventy-four articles were included. Pooled PPB rate was 5.1% (95% confidence interval, 4.5%-5.7%), which did not vary according to different study designs. Male sex (OR, 1.25), cardiopathy (OR, 1.54), antithrombotic drugs (OR, 1.63), cirrhosis (OR, 1.76), chronic kidney disease (OR, 3.38), tumor size > 20 mm (OR, 2.70), resected specimen size > 30 mm (OR, 2.85), localization in the lesser curvature (OR, 1.74), flat/depressed morphology (OR, 1.43), carcinoma histology (OR, 1.46), and ulceration (OR, 1.64) were identified as significant risk factors for PPB, whereas age, hypertension, submucosal invasion, fibrosis, and localization (upper, middle, or lower third) were not. Procedure duration > 60 minutes (OR, 2.05) and the use of histamine-2 receptor antagonists instead of proton pump inhibitors (OR, 2.13) were the procedural factors associated with PPB, whereas endoscopist experience and preprocedural proton pump inhibitors were not. Second-look endoscopy was not associated with decreased PPB (OR, 1.34; 95% confidence interval,.85-2.12). Conclusions: Risk factors for PPB were identified that can help to guide management after gastric ESD, namely adjusting further management. Second-look endoscopy is not associated with decreased PPB.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 15
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

Unusual cause for upper GI bleeding: a splenic artery aneurysm mimicking a Dieulafoy lesion. Role for systematic EUS assessment? (2010)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Pinto Marques, P; Giria, J; Brito, M; Camacho, R; Loureiro, R
Ulcerative esophagitis caused by etidronate (2001)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Macedo G; Azevedo, F; Ribeiro, T
Through-the-needle biopsy sampling may allow preoperative intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia subtyping (2020)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Vilas Boas, F; Costa Moreira, P; Moutinho Ribeiro, P; Martins, D; Lopes, J; Macedo G
There is no clinical evidence of consequences after methylene blue chromoendoscopy (2008)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Mario Dinis Ribeiro; Moreira Dias, L
The natural history of steroid-naive eosinophilic esophagitis: the other end of the spectrum (2015)
Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
Rodrigues Pinto, E; Pereira, P; Macedo G

See all (55)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-24 at 02:36:15 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing