Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?
Publication

Publications

Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?

Title
Surgery for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Is Laparoscopy a New Paradigm?
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2021
Authors
Pereira, A
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Sousa, HS
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Goncalves, D
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
da Costa, EL
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
André Pinho
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page Without ORCID
Barbosa, E
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
José Barbosa
(Author)
FMUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
The Journal is awaiting validation by the Administrative Services.
Vol. 2021
Pages: 1-6
ISSN: 2090-1445
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00T-XWF
Abstract (EN): Introduction. Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer (PPU) remains controversial mainly due to its safety and applicability in critically ill patients. The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in the treatment of PPU. Methods. Single-institutional, retrospective study of all patients submitted to surgical repair of PPU between 2012 and 2019. Results. During the study period, 169 patients underwent emergent surgery for PPU. A laparoscopic approach was tried in 60 patients and completely performed in 49 of them (conversion rate 18.3%). The open group was composed of 120 patients (included 11 conversions). Comparing the laparoscopic with the open group, there were significant differences in gender (male/female ratio 7.2/1 versus 2.2/1, respectively; p = 0.009) and in the presence of sepsis criteria (12.2% versus 38.3%, respectively; p = 0.001), while the Boey score showed no differences between the two groups. The operative time was longer in the laparoscopic group (median 100' versus 80', p = 0.01). Laparoscopy was associated with few early postoperative complications (18.4% versus 41.7%, p = 0.004), mortality (2.0% versus 14.2%; p = 0.02), shorter hospital stay (median 6 versus 7 days, p. 0.001), and earlier oral intake (median 3 versus 4 days, p = 0.021). Conclusion. Laparoscopic repair of PPU may be considered the procedure of choice in patients without sepsis criteria if expertise and resources are available. This kind of approach is associated with a shorter length of hospital stay and earlier oral intake. In patients with sepsis criteria, more data are required to access the safety of laparoscopy in the treatment of PPU.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 6
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-08-07 at 14:07:05 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing