Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > Clinical records in removable prosthodontics: Paper vs computorized format
Publication

Publications

Clinical records in removable prosthodontics: Paper vs computorized format

Title
Clinical records in removable prosthodontics: Paper vs computorized format
Type
Article in International Conference Proceedings Book
Year
2014
Authors
Cunha, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Reis Campos, JCR
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Conference proceedings International
Pages: 177-179
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Biodental Engineering
Porto, 7 a 8 de dezembro de 2012
Indexing
Publicação em ISI Web of Knowledge ISI Web of Knowledge - 0 Citations
Publicação em Scopus Scopus - 0 Citations
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-009-ZHS
Abstract (EN): Oral-health clinical records in a computorized format are increasingly being adopted in dental schools with the objective to improve office efficiency and operations, diagnosis and treatment and patient communication and perception. However, computer pacient records only cover the information of paper-based records partially. The aim of this research was to evaluate the contents of paper-based clinical records of a dental medicine specialty (removable prosthodontics), of national and foreing dental schools, in order to develop a Baseline Prosthodontic Record (BPR), and compare it to the school's records in paper and in an electronic format. The data recorded allowed us to establish a Baseline Prosthodontic Record with 14 categories and 266 parameters distributed by these same categories. A review of the paper and the electronic-based records with the BPR shows that the former contains, on average, 49.5% of the parameters of the BPR, while the latter contains only 26.7%.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 3
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-12 at 19:35:28 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing