Abstract (EN):
In the context of mixed markets, Matsumura and Kanda (J Econ 84(1): 27-48, 2005) show that social welfare in free entry equilibrium is maximized when there exists a public firm in the market. En passant, these authors state that this outcome is connected to the entry-deterring influence of a public firm. In this way, they counter-act the excess entry problem of Mankiw and Whinston (Rand J Econ 17(1): 48-58, 1986). We explain this result arguing that the state-owned firm can be an indirect instrument to regulate entry. In fact, under free entry equilibrium welfare may be greater with the presence of a public firm than with a social planner.
Language:
English
Type (Professor's evaluation):
Scientific
Contact:
abrandao@fep.up.pt
No. of pages:
12