Go to:
Logótipo
Comuta visibilidade da coluna esquerda
Você está em: Start > Publications > View > National policies and municipal practices: A comparative study of Czech and Portuguese urban mobility plans
Publication

Publications

National policies and municipal practices: A comparative study of Czech and Portuguese urban mobility plans

Title
National policies and municipal practices: A comparative study of Czech and Portuguese urban mobility plans
Type
Article in International Scientific Journal
Year
2020
Authors
Klimova, A
(Author)
Other
The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. The person does not belong to the institution. Without AUTHENTICUS Without ORCID
Paulo Pinho
(Author)
FEUP
View Personal Page You do not have permissions to view the institutional email. Search for Participant Publications View Authenticus page View ORCID page
Journal
Vol. 8
Pages: 1247-1255
ISSN: 2213-624X
Publisher: Elsevier
Other information
Authenticus ID: P-00S-R5C
Abstract (EN): Previous research on sustainable urban mobility plans (SUMPs) emphasizes the essential role of guidelines published by the European Commission and of national policies in the processes of developing SUMPs. To provide a more in-depth insight into this topic, the present paper analyses the different approaches and assesses the level of consistency in applying the sustainable mobility principles contained within existing guidelines issued by the European Commission and by the Member States when preparing SUMPs. A comparative analysis was conducted on the mobility plans of the municipalities of Olomouc (Czech Republic) and Matosinhos (Portugal) and the role of the corresponding national guidelines. The results reveal that while these documents deal with the principles slightly differently, the guidelines embrace roughly the same main policies and strategies regarding mobility planning, surely as a result of the existing common learning environment on these matters within the EU. Further, the results indicate that it can be beneficial if the plans are allowed purposefully to deviate marginally from guidelines as long as the resulting SUMPs keep within common principles while only applying them in different ways. In this respect, the plan of the Portuguese municipality provides an interesting example since it widely applies the concept of accessibility and uses this concept as an instrument to set the main targets, even though this is not clearly portrayed in the corresponding guidelines. The paper contributes to the joint discussion of the role of such guidelines at the EU and national levels and to the possibility to introduce a balanced discretion on their practical application. Additionally, the findings are useful for enhancing the understanding of how the guidelines' theoretical grounds are applied in planning practice.
Language: English
Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific
No. of pages: 9
Documents
We could not find any documents associated to the publication.
Related Publications

Of the same journal

What are the risk behaviors of Brazilian and Portuguese drivers? An exploratory approach using self-reported data (2021)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Cintia Isabel de Campos; Cira Souza Pitombo; Patricia Delhomme; Sara Ferreira
The application of direct ridership models in the evaluation of the expansion of the Porto Light Rail Transit (2024)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Paulo Pinho; Lopes, M; Altieri, M; Sá, FME; Cecília Silva; Amante, A
School mobility management case study: German School of Oporto (Deutsche Schule zu Porto) (2019)
Article in International Scientific Journal
João Teixeira; Cecília Silva; João Valente Neves
Revealing the strength of gross potential for cycling as a planning support for starter cycling cities (2022)
Article in International Scientific Journal
Cecília Silva; Lopes, M; Dias, AM
New mobility patterns and policies in the COVID-19 era (2025)
Article in International Scientific Journal
António Lobo; Pierluigi Coppola

See all (8)

Recommend this page Top
Copyright 1996-2025 © Faculdade de Direito da Universidade do Porto  I Terms and Conditions  I Acessibility  I Index A-Z
Page created on: 2025-07-16 at 18:18:47 | Privacy Policy | Personal Data Protection Policy | Whistleblowing