Chemotherapy Treatments for Burkitt Lymphoma: Systematic Review of Interventional Studies

• Type: Another Publication in an International Scientific Journal
• Date: 2021

Authors

Della Rocca, AM (Author) Other; Leonart, LP (Author) Other; Ferreira, VL (Author) Other; Tonin, FS (Author) Other; Steffenello Durigon, G (Author) Other; Del Moral, JAG (Author) Other; Fernandez Llimos, F (Author) FFUP; Pontarolo, R (Author) Other

Journal

Title: Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia

Vol. 21

Pages: 514-525

ISSN: 2152-2650

Publisher: Cancer Media Group

Indexing

ISI Web of Knowledge - 1 Citation

Scopus - 1 Citation

Other information

Authenticus ID: P-00T-VR0

DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2021.03.012

Abstract (EN): This report was the first comparing chemotherapy protocols in Burkitt lymphoma patients classified according to the World Health Organization (2008 version or later). Nine studies with a high heterogeneity regarding the composition of protocols (CODOX-M/IVAC, EPOCH, BFM, and protocols without rituximab) and outcome reporting (the overall survival for CODOX-M/IVAC varied from 72% to 84% [1-5 years data]) were identified. Background: Burkitt lymphoma (BL) is an aggressive hematologic cancer. This study synthetized the evidence about the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy treatments used in patients with BL using the World Health Organization classification. Materials and Methods: A systematic review of interventional studies was performed. A search was carried out in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, with additional manual and gray literature searches. The methodological quality of articles was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Results: We identified 1358 studies; 9 nonrandomized studies satisfied the eligibility criteria (n = 544 patients). The BL epidemiologic variants were sporadic BL (44.5%), endemic BL (47.2%), and immunodeficiency-associated BL (8.3%). Regarding chemotherapy protocols, 4 groups were identified: based on CODOX-M/IVAC (n = 4), EPOCH (n = 1), BFM (n = 1), and simplified treatment schemes used in African countries (n = 3). Most studies had moderate quality. Empirically and qualitatively, the best options for adults with sporadic BL were 'DA-EPOCH-R' (7-year overall survival [OS], 100%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 82-100), 'HDR + LD into CODOX-M/IVAC' (2-year OS, 84%), and 'RD-CODOX-M/IVAC' (4-year progression-free survival, 92%; 95% CI, 77100); in pediatric patients, the 'BFM-NHL-90-like' showed promising results (3-year OS, 90%). For immunodeficiencyassociated BL, the 'SC-EPOCH-RR' demonstrated a good therapeutic profile (6-year OS, 90%; 95% CI, 60-98). The 'Malawi 2012-2014' (1-year OS, 73%; 95% CI, 61-85) could be the treatment choice in endemic BL (Afr ican countr ies). The main adverse events were hematologic. Conclusion: Selecting chemotherapy protocols for BL should be grounded in its epidemiologic variants. Further studies with greater methodological quality are needed to strengthen the evidence.

Language: English

Type (Professor's evaluation): Scientific

No. of pages: 12